• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: B. BRAUN AVITUM AG - MELSUNGEN DIALOG+® ; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

B. BRAUN AVITUM AG - MELSUNGEN DIALOG+® ; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILIT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 710500L
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Hypovolemic Shock (1917); Hypovolemia (2243)
Event Date 10/08/2021
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report has been identified as b.Braun medical inc.Internal report number (b)(4).The investigation is ongoing at this time.A follow up will be submitted when the investigation results become available.
 
Event Description
As reported by user facility: a patient passed away while on the machine.Per the nurses, the venous catheter came partially out but not all the way.They believe this may have happened when the patient pulled his arm under the blanket but it's not known for sure.The patient's arm was under a blanket and blood was coming out around the venous catheter.The arterial catheter was intact.Nurses said no low pressure venous alarm went off.The nurse checked on the patient and he wasn't responsive.The nurse pulled back the blanket and saw a big pile of blood and then the alarm went off.This occurred about three (3) plus hours into the treatment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report has been identified as b.Braun medical inc.Internal report number (b)(4).The evaluation of the trend data record showed that about 2:29 [h:mm] after therapy start, the venous pressure decreased from about 190 mmhg to about 140 mmhg.Since the lower venous pressure limit was 138 mmhg, no alarm was triggered.This might have been the time when the venous access dislocated.At 2:31 [h:mm] the alarm "arterial pressure - lower limit" was triggered.The blood pump stopped and the dialysis machine switched into patient-safe mode.As a follow-up alarm due to the stop of the blood pump, the alarm "venous pressure - lower limit - check access" was triggered.The alarms were acknowledged by the operator.Twenty-three (23) minutes later the alarm "venous pressure - upper limit" was triggered and also acknowledged by the operator.After another eight (8) minutes the alarm "venous pressure - lower limit - check access" was triggered and acknowledged by the operator.This was likely the time the nurse detected the dislocation of the venous access.Until the trend data record ended abruptly, about 30 minutes later, numerous air and pressure alarms were triggered.The evaluation of the trend data record does not show any malfunction of the dialog+ dialysis machine.It operated as intended.The technical inspection of the dialog+ machine showed that the blood pressure measuring (abpm) module was inoperative, otherwise the dialog+ machine operated as intended.The therapy in question was performed without using the abpm module.Thus it did not have any influence on the situation described above.Furthermore, even if it would have been used, it would not have had an influence.As outlined in iec/tr 62653 (guideline for safe operation of medical equipment used for haemodialysis treatments), the venous pressure monitor of a dialysis machine may not reliably detect leaks, blood tubing separation from the blood access device, or needle dislodgement.Little or no pressure change may occur depending on the circumstance.It is unlikely but possible for a leak to occur, the blood tubing to separate, or access needle to dislodge without venous pressure alarm.For that reason, the patient's safety is only ensured by careful monitoring by the operator.Dependent on the venous pressure drop and the alarm limits set, the pressure monitoring system of the dialog+ machine as dialysis machines in general, might not reliably detect a disconnection or dislodgement of the venous patient access.Therefore, the instructions for use of the dialog+ dialysis machine shows the following warning: risk to patient due to blood loss if cannulas get disconnected or dislodged! standard monitoring function of the dialysis machine cannot ensure detection if the cannulas get disconnected or dislodged.Ensure that the access to the patient always remains fully visible during therapy.Ensure that cannulas are adequately fixed.Regularly check patient access.Venous lower limit should be set to greater than or equal to 20 mmhg in tsm (technical service mode).If additional pertinent information becomes available a follow-up report will be filed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DIALOG+® 
Type of Device
DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
B. BRAUN AVITUM AG - MELSUNGEN
schwarzenberger weg 73-79
melsungen, D-342 12
GM  D-34212
Manufacturer (Section G)
B. BRAUN AVITUM AG - MELSUNGEN
schwarzenberger weg 73-79
melsungen, D-342 12
GM   D-34212
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan severino
824 12th avenue
bethlehem, PA 18018-0027
4847197287
MDR Report Key12689865
MDR Text Key278153901
Report Number3002879653-2021-00070
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/09/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number710500L
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/08/2021
Initial Date FDA Received10/25/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/08/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/09/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/12/2006
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient SexMale
-
-