• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SPYGLASS DISCOVER DIGITAL CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SPYGLASS DISCOVER DIGITAL CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 4678
Device Problem Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problem Perforation (2001)
Event Date 09/17/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age or date of birth: patient's exact age is unknown; however it was reported that the patient was over the age of 18.(product code): ntn.The complainant was unable to report the lot number; therefore the manufacture date and expiration date are unknown.However, the complainant stated that the device was used prior to the expiration date.The complainant indicated that the device was disposed and will not be returned for evaluation; therefore, a problem analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a spyglass discover digital catheter was used in the cystic duct, common bile duct, and intra-hepatic ducts during a living donor liver hepatectomy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2021.During the procedure, the surgeon was trying to pass the spyglass discover digital catheter through the cystic duct, into the common bile duct, and up into the hepatic ducts to visualize the intra-hepatic ducts.The patient's cystic duct was very small and it was difficult to get the spyglass catheter into the duct.The surgeon used a dilation balloon to widen the cystic duct opening and then inserted a guidewire through the cystic duct into the common bile duct and then tried to use the guidewire as a rail over which to pass the spyglass discover catheter to gain access into the common bile duct.These attempts were unsuccessful and the surgeon decided to abort this portion of the procedure and proceeded with completing the transplant in his usual method.Post procedure, perforation was noticed in the distal common bile duct/cystic duct common bile duct confluence of the patient.In the physician's assessment, the spy discover catheter contribute to patient's perforation as the cystic duct and the common bile ducts of the patient was very small and had a hard time accommodating the catheter.The size of the catheter made it challenging to access the targeted anatomy.Two follow up endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure was performed to manage the perforation and bile leak.It was reported that the patient is expected to fully recover.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPYGLASS DISCOVER DIGITAL CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key12697614
MDR Text Key278362627
Report Number3005099803-2021-05595
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FBN
UDI-Device Identifier08714729994183
UDI-Public08714729994183
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K200483
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/26/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number4678
Device Catalogue NumberM00546780
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/06/2021
Initial Date FDA Received10/26/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-