(b)(6), 2021, rms and risk factors for primary failure of metallic ureteral stents: experience from a tertiary center in our hospital, the retrograde method of stent insertion is performed under general anesthesia by urologists.Initially, an introduction set similar to an 8f/10f dilator is passed over a guidewire into the renal pelvis.The wire and inner catheter are removed, and the resonance stent is passed through the 10f introducer sheath.The inner catheter is then used to push the stent proximally until the pigtail is placed in the renal pelvis.Finally, the 10f sheath is retracted with the inner catheter held in place until the distal pigtail is deployed in the bladder.The whole procedure is performed under fluoros-copy.A total of 124 stents were inserted into 96 patients because there were 28 patients having bilateral stents.Sepsis was noted in three patients.These were managed conservatively.
|
Device evaluation the resonance stent set device of unknown lot number involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.Complaint was raised in the literature article hsu 2021 "rms and risk factors for primary failure of metallic ureteral stents: experience from a tertiary center".Complaint files (b)(4) were raised as a result of the literature article.(b)(4) (report reference number 3001845648-2021-00758) was raised to capture 21 cases off label rms being placed for intrinsic compression.(b)(4) (report reference number 3001845648-2021-00759) was raised to capture 15 cases stent failure + intervention.(b)(4) was raised to capture various minor ae¿s.(b)(4) (report reference number 3001845648-2021-00761) was raised to capture 35 cases of symptomatic utis.This complaint was raised to capture 3 cases sepsis.Lab evaluation n/a.Document review: as the rpn and lot number of the complaint stents are unknown, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.However, prior to distribution all resonance stent set devices are subject to visual a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.It should be noted that the instructions for use (ifu0020) states the following: ¿potential adverse events associated with indwelling ureteral stents include: infections, urinary symptoms (frequency, urgency, incontinence, dysuria, hematuria), urinary tract tissue erosion¿.¿warnings individual variations of interaction between stents and urinary system are unpredictable¿.Image review n/a.Impression n/a.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.Sepsis is a known risk captured in the cer as a less common, more severe complication.The instances are not available.Summary: the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.According to the initial reporter, the patient required hospitalisation/prolong hospitalisation.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|