• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BEDS BY GEORGE, INC. BEDS BY GEORGE; HAVEN 3000

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BEDS BY GEORGE, INC. BEDS BY GEORGE; HAVEN 3000 Back to Search Results
Model Number 3000
Device Problems Crack (1135); Nonstandard Device (1420); Material Separation (1562); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
After extensive review, device did not meet manufacturing guidelines/quality for proper sewing of canopy.This was an oversight by our sewing department that missed the stitch line, causing the mesh to be weaker in the foot panel.This is a warranty as a manufacturing defect and a new canopy is being provided to user.
 
Event Description
Atp for beds by george (bbg) dealer (national seating & mobility in (b)(6)) sent an e-mail on 11/10/21 informing bbg that the mesh in the foot section of their haven canopy (bed) had pulled away from the fabric, creating a substantial hole/tear/opening.The atp stated that he saw the hole in the canopy a couple of weeks prior and it was much smaller.About 4 inches according to him but has since become larger.Bbg was not notified about the original hole, and was not notified of any damage until 11/20.Mom told atp that the rip is from the user pushing & kicking (she is aggressive) but does not feel that an implement was involved to start the hole.Atp states that the user is (b)(6) & very powerful.Atp provided pictures to bbg; and after extensive review of the pictures and further investigation which included review of the pictures with bbg's head designer and discussion with the sewing department, it has been determined that this canopy does not meet bbg's quality production standards and was not sewn correctly.In specific, the canopy in question uses bbg's 'heavy duty' (hd) mesh product.This is nearly twice the strength of standard mesh and is designed for users such as this, subjectively much stronger than even this user.In fact, to date, there have been zero failures of bbg's hd mesh product.However, when reviewing the pictures, it shows that the sewing department missed a stitch line for the reinforcement backing that reinforces the mesh with a backing to the fabric for strength.This is a double stitch line for extra strength and the stitch line that was sewn missed the backing and mesh in this area, leading to the mesh being able to pull away with the kicking behavior.This was likely not to occur if the stitch line had been sewn correctly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BEDS BY GEORGE
Type of Device
HAVEN 3000
Manufacturer (Section D)
BEDS BY GEORGE, INC.
219 caravan drive
elkhart IN 46514
Manufacturer (Section G)
BEDS BY GEORGE, INC.
109 14th ave.
s building 2
middlebury IN 46540
Manufacturer Contact
angela faubion
219 caravan drive
elkhart, IN 46514
5743332310
MDR Report Key12812847
MDR Text Key288106022
Report Number3008830652-2021-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OYS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Inspection
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/10/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number3000
Device Catalogue Number3000
Device Lot NumberN. EVA 011121-2
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/01/2021
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/10/2021
Initial Date FDA Received11/15/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/09/2021
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age11 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight23 KG
-
-