H.6.Investigation: ¿ scope of issue: the scope of issue is only limited to bd facs lyse wash assistant, part # 337146 and serial # (b)(6).¿ problem statement: customer reported a complaint regarding sample carryover.¿ manufacturing defect trend: there are zero qns (quality notifications) related to the reported issue.Date range from 22oct2020 to 22oct2021.¿ complaint trend: there are 11 complaints related to the issue of sample carryover.Date range from 22oct2020 to 22oct2021.¿ manufacturing device history record (dhr) review: dhr part #337146 serial # (b)(6) , file # (b)(4), was reviewed.The instrument met all the manufacturing specifications prior to release.¿ investigation result / analysis: the investigation was performed and based on the review of the complaint trend, defect trend, dhr, risk analysis and servicemax, the root cause of the carryover between sample tests could not be determined.The customer had initially reported that they observed carryover between sample tests.The fse (field service engineer) that came onsite responding to the complaint ran several tests with the customer to observe the carryover, but the instrument was functioning as expected with no erroneous results.No parts were requested for evaluation as there were no parts replaced.Although the unexpected results were from patient samples, no patient was treated nor harmed from incorrect results.The results were captured prior to any diagnosis decision and was reported to bd as not expected.Proper daily and monthly cleaning procedures may help in reducing the chance of carryover, and can be found under ¿maintenance¿ in the user guide; bd facs¿ lyse wash assistant system instructions for use, #23-11113-01 rev.1/vers.A, page 111.The safety risk is moderate, s3, and there was no impact to patient health or safety.¿ service max review: review of related work order #: 02168973, case # (b)(4).Install date: 28mar2019.Defective part number: n/a.Work order notes: o subject / reported: 337146 - bd facs lyse wash assistant - carryover.O problem description: customer suspects a carryover between samples.When acquiring tubes with the cytometer, they see populations from the previous tubes.O work performed: lwa compliant.O cause: lwa.O solution: after several tests carried out with the client, everything seems normal to me.Support requested from the application service.¿ returned sample evaluation: a return sample was not requested because there were no parts replaced.¿ risk analysis: risk management file part # 337146ra, rev.02/vers.C, bd facs¿ lyse/wash assistant risk analysis was reviewed.No new hazards have been identified and the current mitigation is sufficient.Hazard(s) identified? yes or no.O id: (b)(6).O hazard: carryover.O cause: clogged orifice.O harmful effects: incorrect results, damaged instrument.O risk control: replace orifice at each pm interval.O implementation verification: reliability testing in sv lab; protocol: gppd0010-03 rev a.O effectiveness verification: system characterization summary report lwa carryover evaluation phase iii version 1.0 10/mar/2010.O probability: 1.O severity: 3.O risk index: 3.O residual risk evaluation: a.O new hazards: none.Mitigation(s) sufficient: yes or no? ¿ root cause: based on the investigation results the root cause of the carryover between samples could not be determined.¿ conclusion: based on the investigation results the root cause of the carryover between samples could not be determined.After receiving the customer complaint, an fse came onsite to confirm the issue.After running several tests with the customer, the fse determined that the instrument was functioning as expected with no erroneous results.No one was harmed or injured, and no medical diagnosis was performed due to the initial erroneous results.The safety risk is moderate, s3, and there was no impact to patient health or safety.
|