It was reported that during shoulder procedure, internal to patient.When the 1.8mm q-fix mini was used to drill, it broke inside of the patient.The broken piece was not able to retrieved without making a large defects so the surgeon decided to leave it in.It was necessary to drill an additional bone hole as the drill was unable to be extracted from the original bone hole.The procedure was successfully completed with non-significant delay using a n+s back-up device.No further complications were reported.
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).The reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states without the requested information, the reported drill breakage could not be further assessed.The q-fix drill is made of 17-4 ph stainless steel.The drill is an externally communicating device, it is neither manufactured nor intended for implantation.It is also not approved for long term internal tissue exposure and long-term implantation data is not available.The patient impact beyond the reported retained foreign body could not be definitively determined.Micro-motion or movement cannot be predicted.There is potential risk for tissue inflammation and/or pain.It was also reported that an additional bone hole was required to complete the procedure and the impact to the patient is expected to be minimal.No further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.There was no way to determine if the device contributed to the reported event.The complaint was not confirmed.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: 1) excessive force.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|