• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NOVOCURE GMBH OPTUNE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NOVOCURE GMBH OPTUNE Back to Search Results
Model Number TFH9100
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Hydrocephalus (3272)
Event Date 08/29/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Novocure medical opinion is that the event is unrelated to ttfields use.Optune meets the iec 60601-1 standards for electromagnetic compatibility (emc) compliance.It is known to emit energy at the treatment frequency (in this case, 200khz) which is allowable under the standard (see attached pma p100034 pp.14-16 for emc testing verification/validation information).If a sensitive piece of electronic equipment is not properly shielded against such frequencies it could exhibit abnormal behavior.Use of active electronic devices including programmable shunts is listed as a contraindication in the optune instructions for use.Per the ifu, use of optune together with implanted electronic devices has not been tested and may theoretically lead to malfunctioning of the implanted device.Literature review has shown one published case study (chan et al., cureus, 2016 jul; 8(7):e675) which demonstrated that optune did not have any effect on the stability of programmable shunt valve settings in a gbm patient undergoing treatment with optune.Optune does not contain magnetic elements required to modify shunt valve settings of the hakim valve.As the valve system works with a mechanical mechanism electronic interference is not likely.In addition, according to available poster, hydrocephalus continued even after optune discontinuation and valve re-setting, requiring shunt removal surgery.This indicates that the shunt malfunction continued even after optune discontinuation and valve re-adjustment.Vp shunt complications have been reported in the literature as occurring in 11.8% of patients with brain tumors, with 6.7% of patients requiring shunt removal (source: nigim et al, oncology, 2015, 3:1381-1386).Hydrocephalus is an expected event with device use and was reported as an adverse event in the ef-14 trial of optune together with temozolomide (tmz) compared to tmz alone in patients with newly diagnosed gbm in both arms of the trial (1% and 1% in optune/tmz and tmz arms respectively).Hydrocephalus is an expected complication of gbm with a reported incidence of 7.28% (fischer et al., clin neuro & neurosurg, 2014: 27-31).
 
Event Description
During the european association of neurosurgical societies 2021 conference, novocure became aware of a reported case of potential medical device interference with a ventriculoperitoneal (vp) programmable shunt.Novocure investigated the case by contacting the first author of the scientific poster.A (b)(6)-year-old male patient with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (gbm) began optune therapy on (b)(6) 2020, with vp programmable shunt in place (implantation date: (b)(6) 2019).According to available medical records, patient required vp shunt removal surgery in (b)(6) 2020, due to gastrointestinal issues and an external ventricular drain (evd) was placed.On (b)(6) 2020, a programmable ventriculo-arterial (va) shunt was implanted (hakim valve, without anterior chamber, integra).Optune therapy was temporarily discontinued between (b)(6) 2020, and (b)(6) 2020.According to the first author's response, the valve settings were monitored both on (b)(6), and (b)(6) 2020.In the radiographs of both days, the valve opening pressure level was unchanged at 120 mm h2o, until the onset of clinical deterioration on (b)(6) 2020.Per conference poster, valve settings were suspected to have changed during the night of (b)(6) to (b)(6) 2020, which resulted in cerebrospinal fluid (csf) underdrainage.The valve setting was adjusted under fluoroscopy, however hydrocephalus persisted.The malfunctioning va shunt was removed and a new vp shunt (type unknown) was placed on (b)(6) 2020.Patient's optune device logfile review did not reveal any device errors during the reported time frame of valve misalignment between (b)(6)-(b)(6) 2020.Optune was temporarily discontinued between (b)(6)-(b)(6) 2020.Patient resumed optune therapy on (b)(6) 2020, without further complications reported.Optune therapy was permanently discontinued on (b)(6) 2021, due to tumor progression.The author did not provide information regarding whether the vp shunt malfunction continued after optune discontinuation, nor provided information on re-challenge.The valve system was reportedly checked.There was no outflow at 12 cm above meatus acusticus externus, but there was h2o at about 18-20 cm.Therefore, for the physicians it was reasonable to assume that the shunt valve had misaligned from (b)(6)-(b)(6).Per author, the only external influence was ttfields therapy.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OPTUNE
Type of Device
OPTUNE
Manufacturer (Section D)
NOVOCURE GMBH
business village d4
park 6/platz 10
root d4, 6039
SZ  6039
Manufacturer (Section G)
NOVOCURE GMBH
business village d4
park 6/platz 10
root d4, 6039
SZ   6039
Manufacturer Contact
sharon perez
195 commerce way
portsmouth, NH 03801
2077527602
MDR Report Key12978399
MDR Text Key285744106
Report Number3010457505-2021-00190
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NZK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P100034
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/10/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberTFH9100
Device Catalogue NumberTFH9100EU
Device Lot NumberN/A
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/03/2021
Initial Date FDA Received12/10/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/13/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
BIBROCATHOL 2% EYE OINTMENT; BUPRENORPHINE; DEXAMETHASONE; EDOXABAN; ERGOCALCIFEROL; LEVETIRACETAM; LEVOFLOXACIN; METAMIZOLE; OFLOXACIN EYE DROPS; PANTOPRAZOLE; PIPERACILLIN; POTASSIUM POWDER; SPIRONOLACTONE; TAZOBACTAM; TOLPERISONE; TORASEMIDE
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age52 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-