• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SOLYX SIS SYSTEM; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, FEMA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SOLYX SIS SYSTEM; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, FEMA Back to Search Results
Model Number M0068507010
Device Problems Difficult to Advance (2920); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Patient Problem Internal Organ Perforation (1987)
Event Date 12/01/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The exact age of the patient is unknown.However, it was reported the patient was over 18 years.(b)(4).The device has been received for analysis.Upon completion of the problem analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
Note: this manufacturer report pertains to the second of two devices used during the same procedure.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that two solyx blue sis system devices were used during a mid urethral sling + total hysterectomy + suspension + anterior and posterior repair procedure performed on (b)(6) 2021.During the procedure, the physician experienced difficulty advancing the device and the mesh could not be placed due to an unusual anatomy, very large pubic bone and very distended bladder.Reportedly, the mesh could not be successfully implanted without hitting the bladder so the mesh was removed.A second solyx device was then opened and the physician again experienced difficulty advancing the device.The second mesh was then completely removed from the patient; however, the event caused the shaft tip to bend and the bladder was perforated.Reportedly, there was no intervention done to treat bladder perforation as it will heal on its own.The sling placement procedure was cancelled and rescheduled in three months' time; however, the rest of the procedure was completed.
 
Event Description
Note: this manufacturer report pertains to the second of two devices used during the same procedure.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that two solyx blue sis system devices were used during a mid urethral sling + total hysterectomy + suspension + anterior and posterior repair procedure performed on (b)(6), 2021.During the procedure, the physician experienced difficulty advancing the device and the mesh could not be placed due to an unusual anatomy, very large pubic bone and very distended bladder.Reportedly, the mesh could not be successfully implanted without hitting the bladder so the mesh was removed.A second solyx device was then opened and the physician again experienced difficulty advancing the device.The second mesh was then completely removed from the patient; however, the event caused the shaft tip to bend and the bladder was perforated.Reportedly, there was no intervention done to treat bladder perforation as it will heal on its own.The sling placement procedure was cancelled and rescheduled in three months' time; however, the rest of the procedure was completed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Block a2: the exact age of the patient is unknown.However, it was reported the patient was over 18 years.Block h6: patient code e21140 captures the reportable event of bladder perforation.Device code a040609 captures the reportable event of shaft tip bent.Block h10: investigation of the returned single incision sling device revealed that the tip of the delivery device was bent, and the mesh was stretched on both sides.Small amounts of tissue were observed near the mesh carriers.The reported complaint of shaft tip confirmed.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.Based on the available information, it is likely that procedural factors, such as user handling technique during placement or advancement of the device, resulted in excessive force applied to the delivery device and mesh.Therefore, the investigation concluded that the most probable cause for this complaint is adverse event related to procedure, which indicates that the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device had no influence on the event.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SOLYX SIS SYSTEM
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, FEMA
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key13044575
MDR Text Key282559526
Report Number3005099803-2021-07855
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PAH
UDI-Device Identifier08714729961901
UDI-Public08714729961901
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K081275
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberM0068507010
Device Lot Number0028178451
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/15/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/01/2021
Initial Date FDA Received12/20/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/13/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/10/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/11/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient SexFemale
Patient RaceWhite
-
-