Based on the investigation, there was discrepancy with time of the reported event; the user indicated the event between 2-3am however the logs indicate the event at 6am.Upon review of the data between 2 am est and 7 am est, on (b)(6), it was observed there was inherent lag in the sensing technology of the sensor and that the sensor glucose eventually caught up to the calibration (capillary) entry within 3-4 sensor readings.Once the sensor performance recovered as the sensor use moved away from the insertion date, the system displayed better accuracy and there was good agreement between the sensor readings and fingerstick measurements following the event.User did not require medical intervention or treated herself as she wasn't symptomatic.As per dms, user is currently using the system with up to date information.
|