• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARTHROCARE CORP. FIRSTPASS MINI LEFT; ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARTHROCARE CORP. FIRSTPASS MINI LEFT; ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 72290129
Device Problems Break (1069); Firing Problem (4011)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/08/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: case (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a shoulder stabilization procedure, the doctor prepared the mini suture passer left with an a suture, pass the firstpass mini through an s+n orange cannula.On first attempt the doctor grasp the labral tissue that he wanted and proceeded to pull the trigger on the firstpass.The needle and suture did not pass through the suture grasper.On releasing of the trigger the end of the first pass mini top jaw detached from the main body.The doctor removed the device and the fragment remained in the patient.The doctor then removed the material from the shoulder using a grasper, all material was removed and accounted for.The procedure was successfully completed with non-significant delay using a back-up device.No patient complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states one undated photo of the device was provided for review and confirm the reported.Per the customer feedback form, ¿all material was removed and accounted for.¿ the procedure was completed using a back-up device.No patient injuries or adverse consequences were reported.Since no patient injuries are being reported no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of the customer provided image shows a detached upper jaw.It was determined the device did not contribute to the reported event.The complaint was confirmed and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: (1) excessive force (2) tissue thickness (3) damage or debris on the device tip between passes.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection found the the upper jaw detached.The upper jaw was not returned.The device was returned opened without packaging.A visual inspection found the the upper jaw was detached.The upper jaw was not returned for evaluation.The device was returned outside of packaging and no packaging was returned.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states one undated photo of the device was provided for review and confirm the reported.Per the customer feedback form, ¿all material was removed and accounted for.¿ the procedure was completed using a back-up device.No patient injuries or adverse consequences were reported.Since no patient injuries are being reported no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of the customer provided image shows a detached upper jaw.It was determined the device contributed to the reported event.The complaint was confirmed and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: (1) excessive force (2) tissue thickness (3) damage or debris on the device tip between passes.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FIRSTPASS MINI LEFT
Type of Device
ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARTHROCARE CORP.
7000 w. william cannon
austin TX 78735
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARTHROCARE CORP.
7000 w. william cannon
austin TX 78735
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key13101449
MDR Text Key283814818
Report Number3006524618-2021-01073
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NBH
UDI-Device Identifier00885556694565
UDI-Public00885556694565
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/14/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/10/2024
Device Model Number72290129
Device Catalogue Number72290129
Device Lot Number2068441
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/08/2021
Initial Date FDA Received12/28/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/01/2022
07/13/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/02/2022
07/14/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/10/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-