C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, KIT, 6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 1806050J |
Device Problem
Difficult to Flush (1251)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/01/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately one month post port placement procedure, the device allegedly difficult to infuse and unable to flush.It was further reported that catheter occlusion was allegedly suspected and port system was removed from patient.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The catalog number identified has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f are identified.As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The return of the device is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause for the reported failure could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately one month post port placement procedure, the device was allegedly difficult to infuse.It was further reported that the port system was removed from patient.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: one powerport mri isp implantable port attached to a catheter was returned for evaluation.Gross visual, microscopic visual and functional evaluations were performed on the returned device.During functional evaluation the port and the attached catheter were unable to be flushed and port septum was found protruding upon infusion with a leak noted though the septum.However, the septum protrusion and leak was identified only on laboratory conditions during sample evaluation.Even though the reported event was noted during sample evaluation, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported difficult to flush issue as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event are unknown.A definitive root cause for the reported failure could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: h2, g3 h11: h6(method) h11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately one month post port placement procedure, the device was allegedly difficult to infuse.It was further reported that the port system was removed from patient.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|