This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.Event description: it was reported that the patient underwent initial right hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2011 and experienced trochanteric bursitis on (b)(6) 2013, which was treated with heel raises and an injection on (b)(6) 2014.The patient experienced hip pain and a pinched nerve on (b)(6) 2021 and started physical therapy, which is resolved.The implants remain intact.Review of received data: due diligence: no further due diligence required as all required information to support the conclusion is available or was already requested.X-rays: one ap x-ray of the pelvis dated (b)(6) 2021 with an annotation stating weight bearing has been received.This image has been reviewed by external radiologists (hcp) with the following assessment: ap film of the [pelvis] demonstrates a right total hip arthroplasty without hardware failure or loosening.No acute fracture seen.Additionally, the fit of the implants has been assessed as being normal and no cause for pain could be identified.Surgical report: the surgical report for the initial implantation dated (b)(6) 2011 has been received: indication: right hip pain and reduced mobility.Advanced oa on xr.Procedure: right total hip replacement using cement.Patient data: (b)(6), 1943, female, 74kg, 155cm.Nurse review group timeline report received, whereby the primary surgical report as well as the received crf report for study coc09_h02 were reviewed with the following findings: (b)(6) 2011 primary surgery (pg 32).Spinal posterior approach, ebl 200 ml no complications d/c; skilled nursing home, routine pt (b)(6) 2011 6 weeks post op (pgs 40-57) leg length discrepancy; left short 1.0 cm satisfied and participates in mild activities mild pain, ambulates with cane with moderate limp, can walk 6 blocks rom: flexion 120, abduction 40, adduction 0, external rotation 40, internal rotation 20 (b)(6) 2012 6 months post op (pgs 58-73).Satisfied and participates in moderate activities mild pain, limping all the time, unlimited walking distance without assistive device leg length discrepancy; left short 0.5 cm rom: flexion 90, abduction 40, adduction 0, external rotation 20, internal rotation 10 (b)(6) 2012 1 yr follow up (pgs 76-89).Leg length discrepancy; left short 1.0 cm no pain, no limp, no assistive device, unlimited walking distance rom: flexion 120, abduction 45, adduction 0, external rotation 45, internal rotation 10 (b)(6) 2013 2 yr follow up (pgs 90-105).Leg length discrepancy; left short 1.0 cm rom: flexion 100, abduction 40, adduction 0, external rotation 40, internal rotation 20 ae: 3 month history of pain on abduction right hip pain right thigh increased lateral side (trochanteric bursitis), treatment heel raise (pg 170).(b)(6) 2014 3 yr follow up (pgs 106-123).Leg length equal.Rom: flexion 120, abduction 45, adduction 0, external rotation 45, internal rotation 20 ae: injection right hip for trochanteric bursitis (pg 172) (b)(6) 2016 5 yr follow up (pgs 124-141) leg length discrepancy; left short 0.5 cm rom: flexion 90, abduction 40, adduction 0, external rotation 40, internal rotation 20 (b)(6) 2018 7 yr follow up (pgs 142-157) moderate pain leg length discrepancy; left short 1.0 cm rom: flexion 120, abduction 40, adduction 0, external rotation 40, internal rotation 20 (b)(6) 2021 10 yr follow up (pgs 158-167) rom: flexion 120, abduction 45, adduction 0, external rotation 40, internal rotation 20 ae: pain right hip and back, questioning pinched nerve, treatment physiotherapy, resolved (musculoskeletal non-hip) (pg 178) product evaluation: no product was returned; therefore, visual and dimensional evaluation could not be performed.Review of product documentation: device purpose: all involved devices are intended for treatment.Product compatibility: the product combination was approved by zimmer biomet.Dhr review: ncr(s): the quality records show that all specified characteristics have met the specifications valid at the time of production with no ncr with a potential correlation to the reported event was found: biolox delta ceramic liner: 1 part was scrapped due to stains on the surface area biolox delta ceramic femoral head: 1 part was scrapped due to it falling to the ground.Conclusion: it was reported that the patient underwent initial right hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2011 and experienced trochanteric bursitis on (b)(6) 2013, which was treated with heel raises and an injection on (b)(6) 2014.The patient experienced hip pain and a pinched nerve on o(b)(6) 2021 and started physical therapy, which is resolved.The implants remain intact.The quality records show that all specified characteristics have met the specifications valid at the time of production.Therefore, the investigation did not identify a nonconformance or a complaint out of box (coob).No x-rays throughout the course of treatment apart from one x-ray taken on oct 12, 2021 were received.With no complete x-ray follow up it is not possible to evaluate possible changes to the bone and / or implant position in order to investigate possible contributing factors.However, the single received x-ray was reviewed by external hcp with no abnormalities or potential triggers for pain being identified.Additionally, the patient underwent physiotherapy treatment with the reported issue noted as being resolved.Based on the received crf report the reported event can be confirmed.However, pain cannot be related to a single specific failure mode.Based on the given information, a root cause analysis is therefore not possible.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer switzerland manufacturing gmbh considers this case as closed.Zimmer biomet¿s reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|