|
Model Number 388.72 |
Device Problem
Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/01/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Reporter is a j&j sales representative.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted: investigation summary: the complaint device was not received for investigation.A photo investigation was performed based on the image attached in the notes & attachments section of pc titled "image001 2.Png".The image was reviewed and the complaint condition is confirmed.The blade of the rod cutter has a large chip missing.This amount of damage is considered broken (2+ pieces) rather than scratched/nicked.There are no visual signs of scratches or nicks in the photo provided.A definitive assignable root cause could not be determined based on the provided information.No valid lot number was provided or found in the photos, therefore no dhr review was completed.The dhr review will be revisited if a valid lot number is provided or the physical device is received.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.During the investigation, no product design issues or discrepancies were observed (based on the image) that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot - no valid lot number was provided or found in the photos, therefore no dhr review was completed.The dhr review will be revisited if a valid lot number is provided or the physical device is received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2021, the rod cutter was chipped while cutting a rod.Procedure was completed successfully without any surgical delay.This report is for one (1) rod cutter.This is report 1 of 1 for complaint (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: visual inspection: the rod cutter (p/n: 388.72, lot number: 83p5220) was received at us cq.Visual inspection of the complaint device showed one of the cutting jaws had a piece that had broken off of it.Device failure/defect identified? yes.Dimensional inspection: a dimensional inspection was not performed due to post-manufacturing damage.Document/specification review: no design issues or discrepancies were identified.Complaint confirmed? yes.Investigation conclusion: this complaint is confirmed as one of the cutting jaws had a piece broken off.No definitive root cause could be determined based on the provided information.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: part number: 388.72, lot number: 83p5220, manufacturing site: tuttlingen, release to warehouse date: 17-feb-2021.A review of the device history records was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.The raw material certificate was reviewed and the used material was according to the specification of the device.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|