• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number DBEC-125
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 11/28/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Glideassist mode was used to advance the diamondback coronary orbital atherectomy device (oad) to a lesion in the left circumflex (lcx) artery.The vessel was heavily tortuous and 90% stenosed at the lesion.Three treatment passes were performed on low speed, and then three distal-to-proximal treatment passes were performed on high speed.During the third treatment pass on high speed, the physician felt the tactile feedback of the device was unusual.An abnormality of the crown was observed on imaging.The oad was removed from the patient and was found to be fractured at that time.The procedure was completed with a non-csi device without further issue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of the reported device is in progress.A supplemental report will be submitted when the device analysis is completed.Csi id: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated data: b4, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6, h10.Device analysis conclusion: the oad and guidewire were returned for analysis.The reported driveshaft fracture was confirmed at the proximal edge of the crown.Driveshaft flexing at the weld location can initiate a fatigue failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis identified fatigue striations at the site of the driveshaft fracture.It is hypothesized that this driveshaft underwent excessive flexing near the crown due to spinning in excessive tortuosity or resistance that pushed the driveshaft into a tight bend shape.However, the exact root cause of this reported complaint remains undetermined.When tested the oad functioned as intended.It should be noted that the diamondback 360 coronary orbital atherectomy system instructions for use manual warns, "never force the crown if any resistance is felt within the vessel as vessel perforation may occur.If resistance is felt, retract the crown, while monitoring the cause of the resistance, and immediately stop treatment.Use fluoroscopy to analyze the situation and to monitor the cause of the resistance.".Csi id: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM
Type of Device
CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
morgan hill
1225 old hwy 8 nw
st. paul, MN 55112
MDR Report Key13114459
MDR Text Key285637589
Report Number3004742232-2021-00433
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier10852528005794
UDI-Public(01)10852528005794(17)230228(10)369467
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P130005
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/01/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2023
Device Model NumberDBEC-125
Device Lot Number369467
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/16/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/03/2021
Initial Date FDA Received12/29/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/05/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/23/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age74 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight61 KG
-
-