BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 101-9812 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Fall (1848)
|
Event Date 12/08/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that although the physician had initially assessed that the patient was not a surgical candidate for the indirect decompression spacer, he later decided to proceed with implanting two spacers.The patient experienced a non-device related fall and dislodged the spacer that was implanted between the fifth lumbar vertebra and the first sacral vertebra.The physician assessed that the patients stenosis was severe, and chose to explant both devices and perform a endoscopic decompression with a competitors device.Due to the patients difficult anatomy, the physician was only able to explant the spacer that was between the fourth and fifth vertebrae, and the other spacer remained implanted.Mfg.Report 3006630150-2021-07401 for the device that remains implanted.There were no patient complications during the explant procedure.There will be no further course of action regarding the device that remains implanted in the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device analysis performed on the returned indirect decompression spacer revealed the device had damage on the screw thread as well as severe abrasion on the mating surface of the actuator and on one of the wings of the inferior cam lobe.In addition, a functional test revealed there was slight resistance when deploying the spacer.It was assessed that this damage most likely occurred during the explant procedure.A product labeling review identified that the device was not used per instructions for use ifu as it states that the spacer is contraindicated in patients with spinal anatomy or disease that would cause the device to be unstable in situ.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that although the physician had initially assessed that the patient was not a surgical candidate for the indirect decompression spacer, he later decided to proceed with implanting two spacers.The patient experienced a non-device related fall and dislodged the spacer that was implanted between the fifth lumbar vertebra and the first sacral vertebra.The physician assessed that the patients stenosis was severe, and chose to explant both devices and perform a endoscopic decompression with a competitors device.Due to the patients difficult anatomy, the physician was only able to explant the spacer that was between the fourth and fifth vertebrae, and the other spacer remained implanted.There were no patient complications during the explant procedure.There will be no further course of action regarding the device that remains implanted in the patient.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|