• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE Back to Search Results
Model Number 101-9812
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Fall (1848)
Event Date 12/08/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that although the physician had initially assessed that the patient was not a surgical candidate for the indirect decompression spacer, he later decided to proceed with implanting two spacers.The patient experienced a non-device related fall and dislodged the spacer that was implanted between the fifth lumbar vertebra and the first sacral vertebra.The physician assessed that the patients stenosis was severe, and chose to explant both devices and perform a endoscopic decompression with a competitors device.Due to the patients difficult anatomy, the physician was only able to explant the spacer that was between the fourth and fifth vertebrae, and the other spacer remained implanted.Mfg.Report 3006630150-2021-07401 for the device that remains implanted.There were no patient complications during the explant procedure.There will be no further course of action regarding the device that remains implanted in the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device analysis performed on the returned indirect decompression spacer revealed the device had damage on the screw thread as well as severe abrasion on the mating surface of the actuator and on one of the wings of the inferior cam lobe.In addition, a functional test revealed there was slight resistance when deploying the spacer.It was assessed that this damage most likely occurred during the explant procedure.A product labeling review identified that the device was not used per instructions for use ifu as it states that the spacer is contraindicated in patients with spinal anatomy or disease that would cause the device to be unstable in situ.
 
Event Description
It was reported that although the physician had initially assessed that the patient was not a surgical candidate for the indirect decompression spacer, he later decided to proceed with implanting two spacers.The patient experienced a non-device related fall and dislodged the spacer that was implanted between the fifth lumbar vertebra and the first sacral vertebra.The physician assessed that the patients stenosis was severe, and chose to explant both devices and perform a endoscopic decompression with a competitors device.Due to the patients difficult anatomy, the physician was only able to explant the spacer that was between the fourth and fifth vertebrae, and the other spacer remained implanted.There were no patient complications during the explant procedure.There will be no further course of action regarding the device that remains implanted in the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
VERTIFLEX INC
2714 loker ave west
carlsbad CA 92010
Manufacturer Contact
talar tahmasian
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
6619494863
MDR Report Key13126747
MDR Text Key283140491
Report Number3006630150-2021-07402
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NQO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number101-9812
Device Catalogue Number101-9812
Device Lot Number800197
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/18/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/08/2021
Initial Date FDA Received12/31/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/04/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age74 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient RaceWhite
-
-