Udi: (b)(4).Investigation summary: the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received.Upon visual inspection, the anchor was broken near the middle section, some biological residues were found in the anchor.Only the paper sheath and tray from its box packaging.The suture card was in place.Based on the condition of the anchor, this complaint can be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 7l08882, and no non conformances were identified.This issue was reviewed with the manufacturer; as a result, there are controls in place to 100% inspect the final conditions of the anchor to discard any damage (manufacturing with inspection standard work specification for healix advance br 2 sutures products, manufacturing with inspection tray setting, manufacturing with inspection product assembly).The manufacturing process has been performed according to the validated processes.Resistance of assembly has been evaluated in and the risk is acceptable.The results of production controls (100%) and in-process controls are all compliant based on the condition of the device received and the manufacturing information, a definite root cause cannot be determined.As part of mitek¿s quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
It was reported by the affiliate in (b)(6) that during a rotator cuff repair procedure, it was observed that 4.5 healix advance br w/ocord device anchor was broken off.During an in-house engineering evaluation, it was determined that the anchor device was found to be broken near the middle section and biological residue was found in the anchor.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|