BOLTON MEDICAL, INC. TREO ABDOMINAL STENT-GRAFT SYSTEM; STENT, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 28-B2-26-100U |
Device Problems
Leak/Splash (1354); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/11/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Endoleak (type 1a): imaging performed prior to an evar was plain ct only, no contrast-enhanced ct was performed in view of the patient's low renal function.During the procedure, the ra was confirmed by angiography using contrast medium, and carbon dioxide angiography was used to confirm the bifurcation of the internal and external iliac arteries.In the evar, the treo main bifurcated stent graft was deployed from just below the lowest renal artery and two excluders were used for the legs of the treo.The procedure was completed successfully without any leakage.However, postoperative abdominal ultrasonography revealed a suspected type 1a endoleak.Post-deployment plain ct showed that the proximal portion of the treo stent-graft was not open completely.The preoperative plain ct revealed thin calcification-like substance in the aorta, and the neck of the aneurysm was presumed to have been originally dissected; it was suggested that the endoleak might have occurred due to insufficient deployment of the second stent in the treo stent-graft.On (b)(6) 2022, additional treatment was performed.No endoleak was observed by ultrasonography, however, contrast enhanced ct revealed a type 1a endoleak.Though it was dissection, by applying force to the neck of the treo stent-graft using a balloon the second stent was opened, and the shape of the neck was successfully corrected.Subsequently, the procedure was completed with the touch-up only.Comment from the physician: the first stent was fully open, however, the graft fabric of the first stent was not fully opened because it was pulled by the second stent, which was not fully opened.Ancillary devices used: excluder141000, excluder121200.Operation type: evar.(tc#:(b)(4)).Patient outcome - "no health damage to the patient.".
|
|
Event Description
|
Endoleak (type 1a): imaging performed prior to an evar was plain ct only, no contrast-enhanced ct was performed in view of the patient's low renal function.During the procedure, the ra was confirmed by angiography using contrast medium, and carbon dioxide angiography was used to confirm the bifurcation of the internal and external iliac arteries.In the evar, the treo main bifurcated stent graft was deployed from just below the lowest renal artery and two excluders were used for the legs of the treo.The procedure was completed successfully without any leakage.However, postoperative abdominal ultrasonography revealed a suspected type 1a endoleak.Post-deployment plain ct showed that the proximal portion of the treo stent-graft was not open completely.The preoperative plain ct revealed thin calcification-like substance in the aorta, and the neck of the aneurysm was presumed to have been originally dissected; it was suggested that the endoleak might have occurred due to insufficient deployment of the second stent in the treo stent-graft.On (b)(6), 2022, additional treatment was performed.No endoleak was observed by ultrasonography, however, contrast enhanced ct revealed a type 1a endoleak.Though it was dissection, by applying force to the neck of the treo stent-graft using a balloon the second stent was opened, and the shape of the neck was successfully corrected.Subsequently, the procedure was completed with the touch-up only.Comment from the physician: the first stent was fully open, however, the graft fabric of the first stent was not fully opened because it was pulled by the second stent, which was not fully opened.Ancillary devices used: - excluder141000.- excluder121200.Operation type: evar.(tc#:(b)(4)).Patient outcome - "no health damage to the patient.".
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|