• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD MID-C 125; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 125
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Implant Pain (4561)
Event Date 09/14/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
First investigation: production process analysis: a review of the dhr demonstrated that the mid-c system was manufactured, tested, and released according to specification.User (surgeon and patient) information analysis: on (b)(6) 2021 the patient has a revision surgery to remove the implant while exposing the implant, the surgeon noticed a bone growth on the medial part of the implant.The surgeon's impression was that 3 vertebras were fused, however, a ct wasn't done to confirm.No metalosis was observed.The ratchet mechanism remained in place.The doctors were able to move it from rachet mode to idle.While removing the implant, prof.Floman suggested the breakage occurred due to the fusing around the apex, although this theory is not supported.By test or mechanically expert.Design: the design of the mid-c system is aiming to take mainly axial forces, resulting from the load generated by the distraction of the curve and the relevant body weight.The device was tested in an axial direction ((b)(4)) and was found to be able to hold 700n load for 10 million cycles of axial load.As part of apifix commitment to continuous improvement, capa #: (b)(4) was initiated to further investigate to prevent and minimize the rate of implant breakage.The company investigation indicated that implant breakage can result from trauma, practicing severe sports, development of hyper-kyphosis, inserting the pedicle screws in a wrong trajectory, not working according to the surgical technique, and most commonly from the implant reaching its end of the way.Breakages were evident in 3 main regions, the implant base, the main rod, and the rod's connection to the poly-axial joint.The most common point of failure was the implant rod in implants reaching their maximal elongation.Corrective action: over the years, the company already implemented corrective action with the following: in nov 2017, all surgeons received a letter detailing the importance of the screw insertion trajectory.The topic is also covered in the company's training presentation.Eco-38, replaced the mid-c 125 that extends by 40 mm to mid-c 125 that extends by 50mm allowing more overlap between the pole and base.Eco-46, a trial tool was added to the surgical tools to aid the surgeon in detecting if access tissue remains below the implant.In march 2020, the topic of practicing severe sports was added to the mid-c training presentation.Risk assessment: the current device breakage rate due to any reason is (b)(4) and is in line with the rate reported in the literature for this type of complication as described in the company's clinical evaluation report ((b)(4)).The risk of the broken rod has been assessed and found to be acceptable ((b)(4) q1 hazard id 1.8 and id 1.7) utofusion is a phenomenon known from skeletally immature patients, in the present case the patient was skeletally mature.The present case is the first to shoe auto fusion out of 600 cases operated to date.The company will continue to monitor this phenomenon.
 
Event Description
The surgeon reported that the patient complained of noises while moving and pain at times, the x-ray demonstrates implant breakage.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 125
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
adi prager
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key13401212
MDR Text Key289284674
Report Number3013461531-2021-00047
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIS
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/03/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Expiration Date01/10/2024
Device Model NumberMID-C 125
Device Catalogue NumberAF125
Device Lot NumberAF 01-01-19
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/14/2021
Initial Date FDA Received01/31/2022
Date Device Manufactured01/10/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-