Model Number A209 |
Device Problems
High impedance (1291); Failure to Sense (1559); Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem (1573); Under-Sensing (1661); Low impedance (2285)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/14/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient underwent a replacement procedure for normal battery depletion.Prior to the procedure a 10 joule shock was delivered and yielded an impedance measurement of 120 ohms.It was noted that an x-ray had been taken a year earlier and indicated there was not a good electrode position.It was planned to first remove the capsule in the device pocket in order to lower the shock impedance.After the bag was closed and connected to the new device, another 10 joule synchronized shock with an impedance of 116 ohms occurred.They put the patient into ventricular fibrillation (vf) as desired by the physician, and the newly implanted s-icd detected the arrhythmia.Time to therapy was under 20 seconds.After the shock is delivered, a zero line appeared for about 10 seconds, but the patient still was in vf.The vf signals reappeared after approximately 10 more seconds, but the s-icd no longer detected every complex and no longer recognized a tachycardia arrhythmia.The shock impedance measurement was now at 3 ohms.External defibrillation was successful.Subsequently the new s-icd was attempted and not implanted.A new s-icd and electrode were implanted with no further issues and a shock impedance measurement of 72 ohms.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The product has been received for analysis.This report will be updated upon completion of analysis.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The product has been received for analysis.This report will be updated upon completion of analysis.Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory visual inspection noted an arc mark on the pg case indicating that a shock was shorted to the pg case.This damaged the pg internally and caused the low shock lead impedance and detection issues noted in the field during the attempted implant.The device did not pass the automated electrical test due to the internal damage from the shock.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient underwent a replacement procedure for normal battery depletion.Prior to the procedure a 10 joule shock was delivered and yielded an impedance measurement of 120 ohms.It was noted that an x-ray had been taken a year earlier and indicated there was not a good electrode position.It was planned to first remove the capsule in the device pocket in order to lower the shock impedance.After the bag was closed and connected to the new device, another 10 joule synchronized shock with an impedance of 116 ohms occurred.They put the patient into ventricular fibrillation (vf) as desired by the physician, and the newly implanted s-icd detected the arrhythmia.Time to therapy was under 20 seconds.After the shock is delivered, a zero line appeared for about 10 seconds, but the patient still was in vf.The vf signals reappeared after approximately 10 more seconds, but the s-icd no longer detected every complex and no longer recognized a tachycardia arrhythmia.The shock impedance measurement was now at 3 ohms.External defibrillation was successful.Subsequently the new s-icd was attempted and not implanted.A new s-icd and electrode were implanted with no further issues and a shock impedance measurement of 72 ohms.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|