• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND CENTRIFUGAL PUMP 5 (CP5); CONTROL, PUMP SPEED, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND CENTRIFUGAL PUMP 5 (CP5); CONTROL, PUMP SPEED, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Model Number 60-02-60
Device Problem Decreased Pump Speed (1500)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/11/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Livanova (b)(4) received a report that during bypass, a level alarm correctly stopped the centrifugal pump 5 (cp5) and following to that the cp5 screen froze and the arterial clamp remained closed.Reportedly, it was not possible to press anything on the screen and it seemed there was also no response from the speed control knob.The pump was turned off and back on and bypass could be resumed.There was no report of patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
There was no patient involvement.Livanova (b)(4) manufactures the centrifugal pump 5 (cp5).The incident occurred in (b)(6).Through follow-up communication livanova learned that the screen froze during the alarm condition when the clamp was closed.The user was unable to see the flow rate or change the pump speed.The lines were manually clamped as the screen/clamp were not responding.The cp5 control panel was turned off and back on and the electrical clamp was manually opened.When power was restored, the cp5 control panel was replaced with another and procedure could be carried on with no further issues.A livanova field service representative was dispatched to the facility to investigate the device and could not reproduce the reported issue.If any additional information pertinent to the reported event is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
There was no patient involvement.Livanova (b)(4) manufactures the centrifugal pump 5 (cp5).The incident occurred in (b)(6).Through follow-up communication livanova learned that the screen froze during the alarm condition when the clamp was closed.The user was unable to see the flow rate or change the pump speed.The lines were manually clamped as the screen/clamp were not responding.The cp5 control panel was turned off and back on and the electrical clamp was manually opened.When power was restored, the cp5 control panel was replaced with another and procedure could be carried on with no further issues.A livanova field service representative was dispatched to the facility to investigate the device and could not reproduce the reported issue.If any additional information pertinent to the reported event is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
Livanova (b)(4) received a report that during bypass, a level alarm correctly stopped the centrifugal pump 5 (cp5) and following to that the cp5 screen froze and the arterial clamp remained closed.Reportedly, it was not possible to press anything on the screen and it seemed there was also no response from the speed control knob.The pump was turned off and back on and bypass could be resumed.There was no report of patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: through follow-up communication livanova learned that the intention was to resolve the alarm, open the clamp and resume flow.The level in the reservoir was resolved via the system panel.The main problem was that the touch screen did not respond to any touch.The menu couldn¿t be entered into, the clamp could not be opened despite resolving the level alarm on the system panel.If any additional information pertinent to the reported event is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
See initial report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.10: the affected device was returned to the manufacturer site for repair.The reported issue could not be reproduced upon device testing.However, the processor board, the touchscreen and the ribbon cables will be replaced.Repair is pending customer approval.If any additional information pertinent to the reported event is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
See initial report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the customer approved the repair quotation.The device was re-tested before repair and the issue could be reproduced.The processor board, the touchscreen and the ribbon cables have been replaced.Subsequent functional verification testing was completed without further issues and the unit was returned to service.The most likely root cause of the reported issue could be traced back to an intermittent malfunction of the processor board.
 
Event Description
See initial report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CENTRIFUGAL PUMP 5 (CP5)
Type of Device
CONTROL, PUMP SPEED, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND
lindberghstrasse 25
munich
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND
lindberghstrasse 25
munich 80309
GM   80309
Manufacturer Contact
enrico greco
14401 w. 65th way
arvada, CO 80004
MDR Report Key13477693
MDR Text Key285691493
Report Number9611109-2022-00055
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWA
UDI-Device Identifier04033817901006
UDI-Public(01)04033817901006(11)181207
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K112225
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number60-02-60
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/11/2022
Initial Date FDA Received02/08/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/16/2022
03/23/2022
08/03/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/17/2022
04/20/2022
09/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/07/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-