• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Unspecified Infection (1930); Urethral Stenosis/Stricture (4501)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature aritlce: "endoscopic management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors in a contemporary cohort" by francesco sanguedolce, md et al.  the study aimed to identify risk factors associated to tumor recurrence and progression in a contemporary cohort of patients diagnosed and treated with the latest endourologic technologies.Median follow-up (fu) was 24 months (interquartile range 17¿44).On multivariate analysis, bladder cancer (bc) recurrence was associated to previous contralateral utuc (hazard ratios: 5.08 confidence interval [95% ci: 1.35¿18.94], p < 0.05) and tumor size (hazard ratios: 1.07 [95% ci: 1.00¿1.14], p < 0.05).Utuc recurrence was associated to incomplete clearance after primary treatment (hazard ratios: 4.99 [95% ci: 1.15¿ 21.62], p < 0.05), while utuc progression was significantly related to the number of utuc recurrences (hazard ratios: 3.10 [95% ci: 1.27¿7.53], p < 0.05).No significant survival differences in bc/utuc recurrence, as well as in utuc progression, were detected between risk groups.No clavien-dindo grade >2 were detected; one patient developed ureteric stricture at 7-month fu.The appropriate use of latest technology may enhance the oncologic outcomes of the endoscopic management of utuc without compromising the safety of the approach.Among the prognostic factors identified in the series, utuc recurrence seems to be associated to disease progression.  self-limiting bleeding (clavien-dindo grade ii) - 4.Infectious complications - 3.Major bleeding requiring blood transfusion - 1.Ureteric stricture in the lumbar tract - 1.  since the literature described "urf-v, narrow band imaging ", we selected "urf-v" as a representative product.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.The literature article is attached for additional information.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key13483389
MDR Text Key289960175
Report Number8010047-2022-02581
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170340321
UDI-Public04953170340321
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSP
PMA/PMN Number
K072957
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/11/2022
Initial Date FDA Received02/08/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-