• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-P6R
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Abrasion (1689); Fever (1858); Pain (1994); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device referenced in this report has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The definitive cause of the user's experience cannot be determined at this time.The investigation is ongoing.This report will be updated upon completion of the investigation or upon receipt of additional relevant information.
 
Event Description
In the literature titled ¿"flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for upper urinary urolithiasis.", it is reported patients experienced adverse effects during and after procedures using uretero-reno fiberscopes urf-p6 or urf-p6r.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports urf-p6r.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports urf-p6.Study aim: to provide a brief overview of one facility¿s experience with ureterorenoscopy for treating upper urinary tract stones including success and complication of this procedure.Method: retrospective review of 93 patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal and proximal ureteral stones using an olympus flexible ureteroscope (either urf-p6 or urf-p6r).Results: study included 93 patients (57 males and 36 females) with a mean age of 50.There were no major ureteral injuries.Mucosal abrasions were noted in four patients and were managed successfully with stent placement.All adverse events were classified with the clavien dindo grading system.Grade one complications were observed in nine patients (moderate pain).Grade two complications were observed in 17 patients (fever, severe pain, and postoperative obstruction).Conclusion: flexible ureteroscopy can be safely used to treat renal and proximal ureteral stones with a low rate of complications.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The dhr was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.The case is not due to design.Based on the results of the investigation, no abnormality or problem with the device has been reported, therefore the cause cannot be identified.Olympus will continue to monitor the field performance of this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key13486690
MDR Text Key287034317
Report Number8010047-2022-02613
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170340833
UDI-Public04953170340833
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTS
PMA/PMN Number
K172298
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/03/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-P6R
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/11/2022
Initial Date FDA Received02/08/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/14/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/03/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-