Catalog Number EVLTPVAK |
Device Problem
Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/27/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported device has yet to be returned to the manufacturer for a device evaluation.An investigation into the root cause for product problem is currently in progress.The results of the investigation will be sent via a follow up medwatch.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
An end user reported an issue with a pvak -- 400 micron perforator and accessory vein ablation kit.During preparation, it was discovered that the fiber was bent and, subsequently, snapped off.At the time of the event, the patient was not in any contact with the product.The procedure was completed with another same device and the patient did not experience any adverse effects, harm, or require medical intervention as a result of this incident.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported device has yet to be returned to the manufacturer for a device evaluation.An investigation into the root cause for product problem is currently in progress.The results of the investigation will be sent via a follow up medwatch.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
An end user reported an issue with a pvak -- 400 micron perforator and accessory vein ablation kit.During preparation, it was discovered that the fiber was bent and, subsequently, snapped off.At the time of the event, the patient was not in any contact with the product.The procedure was completed with another same device and the patient did not experience any adverse effects, harm, or require medical intervention as a result of this incident.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Returned for evaluation was a partial fiber, just the proximal end (gripper and small section of fiber).A visual inspection noted that the fiber fracture it was located at 13.5cm from the distal edge of the black strain relief of the gripper.The customer's reported complaint description of the fiber was bent and detached (snapped off) was confirmed based on evaluation of the returned sample.Although confirmed, a definitive root cause for the fiber fracture could not be determined.A review of the device history records was performed for the indicated lots for any deviations related to the reported failure mode of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly and performance specifications; i.E.No ncr associated with reported failure mode.At the vendor facility, during the manufacturing process, fibers are repeatedly bent and coiled and there is a final visual inspection performed with a hene laser to check the entire fiber length for defects prior to shipment.Labeling review: the directions for use which is supplied to the end user with this catalog number contains the following statement "prior to and during use, avoid damaging the fiber by striking, stressing or excessive bending.Do not coil the fiber tighter than a radius of 60mm".A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no adverse trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.Reference (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reference (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|