The reported event could be confirmed, since operative notes were provided for evaluation and match the alleged failure mode.A device inspection was not possible since the affected device was not returned, and no other evidence was provided for investigation a review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing, or design-related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Formal medical opinion was sought from an experienced independent medical expert as below: ¿the surgeon has treated the patient very well.The patient was well informed and able to decide on the extend of the treatment as well.The surgeon examined the wound and the surgical field in a detailed manner and even though there were no definitive signs of a deep infection, he did the right thing of debridement, exchange of the modular component (pe-liner) and antibiotics (dair-procedure).A state-of-the-art approach one can say.The infection was probably related to the wound healing disorder, but the presence of a total ankle arthroplasty device influences the course of such a disorder, since once the dair-procedure was done, the prolonged wound healing problems (open wound) most likely made the chances of the implanted getting contaminated higher.¿ based on the investigation and medical expert¿s opinion, the root cause was attributed to patient related factors i.E.Wound healing disorder.The presence of a total ankle arthroplasty device also influences the course of such a disorder since once the dair procedure was done, the prolonged wound healing problems (open wound) most likely made the chances of the implanted getting contaminated higher.If any further information is provided, the complaint report will be updated.
|