First investigation: production process analysis: a review of the dhr demonstrated that the mid-c system was manufactured, tested, and released according to specification.User (surgeon and patient) information analysis: the x-ray demonstrated screw breakage, usually breakage occurs due to stress concentration at the weakened point on (b)(6) 2022 the patient has a correction surgery to replace the implant due to screw breakage, no metallosis was observed.Design: the design of the mid-c system is aiming to take mainly axial forces, resulting from the load generated by the distraction of the curve and the relevant body weight.The device was tested in an axial direction ((b)(4) rev a) and was found to be able to hold 700n load for 10 million cycles of axial load.Corrective action: in the present case, a standard apifix screw was used.These screws are not in use today as the company shifted to working with lp screws ((b)(4) on 2018) in (b)(6) 2021, the company is adding a radius of 0.1 mm to the thread of all lp pedicle screws.This radius reduces the stress concentrations and reduces the chance of breakage.((b)(4)).Risk assessment: the current screw breakage rate due to any reason is (b)(4) and is in line with the rate reported in the literature for this type of complication as described in the company's clinical evaluation report (0.2%-15.5%) ((b)(4) rev u).
|