An outside the us customer observed false reactive (positive) atellica im rubella igg (rub g) result from a sample that was considered discordant on comparison with the repeat results from the same sample.Interpretation of results of the instructions for use (ifu) states the following: " results of this assay should always be interpreted in conjunction with the patient's medical history, clinical presentation, and other findings." siemens is investigating.
|
Mdr 1219913-2022-00051 was filed on february 11, 2022.Additional information - april 15, 2022: an outside of the united states (ous) customer contacted a siemens customer care center (ccc) to report a false reactive (positive) atellica im rubella igg (rub g) result from a sample that was considered discordant upon comparison with repeat results from the same sample.The previous result for the patient was nonreactive (negative).The sample was repeated post re-centrifugation and the result was equivocal on the same and an alternate atellica im system with rub g lot 231.The customer reported that calibration was valid and quality control results were within insert ranges, but data was not provided.Siemens reviewed system sample and reagent trace files and there was no indication of a possible issue that could cause the initial false positive result.Pre-analytical factors and/or sample handling leading to particulate matter cannot be ruled out as a probable cause agent of the non-reproducible initial false positive result.Based on the information provided, no product problem has been identified and atellica im rub g lot 231 is performing as intended.The customer is operational, and no further action is required.In section h6, the investigation finding, and investigation conclusion codes were updated.
|