• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARDIACASSIST INC. PROTEK DUO VENO-VENOUS CANNULA; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARDIACASSIST INC. PROTEK DUO VENO-VENOUS CANNULA; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Model Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient information was not provided.Serial number is unknown.This information will be provided in a supplemental report if made available.As the serial number is unknown, the device manufacture date could not be determined.This information will be provided in a supplemental report if made available.Cardiacassist inc.Manufactures the protekduo cannula.The incident occurred in (b)(6).A medical assessment of the case was conducted.The reported syndrome is not related to any specific product malfunction and is related to the use of cannula.In addition, this type of event depends on cannula size selected for patient vessel conformation.The syndrome can be solved only by additional medical intervention or by removal of the obstruction.If any additional information pertinent to the reported event is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
Through literature review livanova became aware of a (b)(6) male patient who underwent lvad and central rvad implantation; the patient's biventricular icd was removed 1 week prior to lvad implantation due to sepsis.Shortly after bivad implants, the central rvad was switched to percutaneous support with protekduo cannula.Approximately 45 hours following device placement, the patient experienced symptoms suggestive of svc (superior vena cava) syndrome.Removal of a pre-existing left internal jugular central venous line was removed and the signs of svc syndrome resolved.The authors concluded that patients with signs of svc syndrome, including facial and chest edema, dyspnea and cough, and nonpulsatile distended neck veins, experienced improvement following either device explantation or removal of the accompanying central venous catheter within the left internal jugular and subclavian venous system.The authors hypothesize that consideration needs to be given to multiple etiologies for svc syndrome and appropriate rv support and early recognition of svc syndrome are needed for preventing venous obstruction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as stated in the initial report, the reported event is not related to any cannula malfunction.Svc syndrome can be multi-factorial and is an inherent risk of the procedure related to the use of a cannula.
 
Event Description
See initial report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEK DUO VENO-VENOUS CANNULA
Type of Device
CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARDIACASSIST INC.
620 alpha drive
pittsburgh PA 15238
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARDIACASSIST INC.
620 alpha drive
pittsburgh PA 15238
Manufacturer Contact
enrico greco
620 alpha drive
pittsburgh, PA 15238
MDR Report Key13541348
MDR Text Key285671367
Report Number2531527-2022-00009
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K160257
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/13/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNKNOWN
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/19/2022
Initial Date FDA Received02/16/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/19/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/15/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-