Catalog Number ZVL14060 |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Off-Label Use (1494); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 01/27/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately three months post stent placement procedure in the right superior lobar bronchus, the stent allegedly broke.It was further reported that the fragments of the stent was left in the patient's body.The patient's current status is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photo, an image and a video were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiration date: 06/2023).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photo, an image and a video were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiration date: 06/2023).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately three months post stent placement procedure in the right superior lobar bronchus, the stent allegedly broke.It was further reported that the fragments of the stent was left in the patient's body.The patient's current status is unknown.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately three months post stent placement procedure in the right superior lobar bronchus, the stent allegedly fractured.It was further reported that some fragments of the stent remain in the patient.The patient's current status is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: a review of manufacturing records was not performed, as additional complaints have not been reported for this lot.Based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.However, the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The provided photos and a video clip show two stents implanted in the lungs; based on the images, one end of the stent was broken off, completely detached and the broken piece of the stent which was reported to have been coughed out by the patient is shown on one image.Based on the information available and analysis of both photos and videos provided, the investigation is closed with confirmed results for "off-label" use.The placement site for this stent was the bronchus which represents off-label use.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling for this product, it was found that the instructions for use sufficiently address the potential risks.With regards to indications for use, the instructions for use states that the stent is to be used on femoral and iliac arteries.Based on reported information, the placement site for this stent was in the lungs which represents off-label use.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: a review of manufacturing records was not performed, as additional complaints have not been reported for this lot.Based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.However, the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The provided photos and a video clip show two stents implanted in the lungs; based on the images, one end of the stent was broken off, completely detached and the broken piece of the stent which was reported to have been coughed out by the patient is shown on one image.Based on the information available and analysis of both photos and videos provided, the investigation is closed with confirmed results for "off-label" use.The placement site for this stent was the bronchus which represents off-label use.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling for this product, it was found that the instructions for use sufficiently address the potential risks.With regards to indications for use, the instructions for use states that the stent is to be used on femoral and iliac arteries.Based on reported information, the placement site for this stent was in the lungs which represents off-label use.H10: d4 (expiry date: 06/2023), g3, h6 (device) h11: h6 (method, result, conclusion) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately three months post stent placement procedure in the right superior lobar bronchus, the stent allegedly broke.It was further reported that the fragments of the stent was left in the patient's body.The patient's current status is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: a review of manufacturing records was not performed, as additional complaints have not been reported for this lot.Based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.However, the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, provided photos and a video clip show two stents implanted in the lungs; based on the images, one end of the stent was broken off, completely detached and the broken piece of the stent which was reported to have been coughed out by the patient is shown on one image.Based on the information available and analysis of both photos and videos provided, the investigation is closed with confirmed results for "off-label" use.The placement site for this stent was the bronchus which represents off-label use.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling for this product, it was found that the instructions for use sufficiently address the potential risks.With regards to indications for use, the ifu states that the stent is to be used on femoral and iliac arteries.Based on reported information, the placement site for this stent was in the lungs which represents off-label use.Section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately three months post stent placement procedure in the right superior lobar bronchus, the stent allegedly fractured.It was further reported that some fragments of the stent remain in the patient.The patient's current status is unknown.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|