• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. VIS ADPT GUIDE LGNP KIT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. VIS ADPT GUIDE LGNP KIT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Model Number V0100109
Device Problem Defective Device (2588)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/02/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: case (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that, while using vis adpt guide lgnp kit during a tka, the tibial guide had too much varus built in.Surgeon had to use standard instrumentation to make proximal tibial cut.It is unknown how long surgery was delayed as consequence.On the other hand, the femoral guide was fine and resulted in a good cut.Patient was not harmed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that, while using vis adpt guide lgnp kit during a tka, the tibial guide had too much varus built in.Surgeon had to use standard instrumentation to make proximal tibial cut.It is unknown how long surgery was delayed as consequence.On the other hand, the femoral guide was fine and resulted in a good cut.Patient was not harmed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: case (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that, while using vis adpt guide lgnp kit during a tka, the tibial guide had too much varus built in.Surgeon had to use standard instrumentation to make proximal tibial cut.Surgery was delayed 5 min as consequence and resulted in additional, unintended resected bone.On the other hand, the femoral guide was fine and resulted in a good cut.The patient was not harmed beyond the described event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal reference number: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per complaint details, the tibial guide had too much varus built in; therefore, the surgeon had to use standard instrumentation to make proximal tibial cut resulting in additional, unintended tibial bone resection as well as a slight (5 min) surgical delay.It was communicated that the requested clinical documentation was not available due to protected health information.Reportedly, the patient was not harmed beyond the reported event.Based on the information provided, the clinical root cause cannot be definitively concluded and the patient impact beyond that which was reported can not be determined.No further medical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.This event was evaluated through our internal quality process and it was concluded that the root cause cannot be confirmed.All checks were found to be within visionaire standards.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.This is a single use device, surgical technique or damage from misuse are likely potential factors that could contribute to the reported event.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VIS ADPT GUIDE LGNP KIT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key13587163
MDR Text Key286054825
Report Number1020279-2022-00822
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier00885556656396
UDI-Public00885556656396
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K170282
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/26/2022
Device Model NumberV0100109
Device Catalogue NumberV0100109
Device Lot Number00221836V1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/03/2022
Initial Date FDA Received02/23/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/24/2022
10/07/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/25/2022
10/10/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured12/28/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-