Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Off-Label Use (1494); Use of Device Problem (1670)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Pallor (2468)
|
Event Date 12/07/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The actual device was not returned for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.The product code/lot # combination was not provided by the user facility, which prevented a meaningful review of the device history record.This report is for the second device reported, for the first device (tr band) reported that was used on the same patient see mdr 1118880-2021-00220.
|
|
Event Description
|
The user facility reported that the treating physician injected air from the tr band inflator into the sheath hub of the glide sheath slender device involved, instead of the tr band inflation balloon.When air was injected into the sheath hub the patient became transiently ill, then made a full recovery.The procedure outcome was successful.The patient was in stable condition.The estimated blood loss was less than 250cc's.The procedure performed was a neurovascular embolization.The amount of air injected into the sheath hub was 18 milliliters.The sheath was immediately aspirated with removal of a small amount of air.The patient soon became pale with diminished responsiveness that lasted for approximately two minutes.There was no change in blood pressure or oxygen saturation, although a small increase in end tidal carbon dioxide was noted.The patient gradually became more responsive without focal deficit and within a relatively short time had returned to baseline neurologic function.The arterial sheath was removed.The patient noted mild pain in the right hand that was soon resolved.Hemostasis was successfully achieved.There was no direct allegation that the reported device caused or contributed to patient injury and/or need for medical intervention.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted as follow up no.1 to provide the the completed investigation results.The actual device was not returned; therefore, an evaluation of the actual device was unable to be conducted.The complaint cannot be confirmed because the sample was not returned for assessment.The cause of the patient becoming ill was that air was pumped into sheath in the patient instead of the tr band.Review of dhr showed there were no issues noted during manufacture of the product that could have contributed to this complaint condition.Currently no action is recommended since this risk evaluation is within the predetermined limits in the failure mode and effects analysis (fmea).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|