The returned device was not submerged in liquid.The device appeared to be dehydrated and exhibited a yellowish, translucent hue.Initial evaluation was conducted on the device as it was returned, seemingly dehydrated.The device feels firmer than a sterile, manufactured device but not as stiff as a fully dehydrated device.Visual examination revealed scuff marks on the side and the base of the implant, which may have been the result of friction against the bone cavity during the implant removal.Slanted indentations were found on the side of the dehydrated implant at a 10° measured angle from the implant base, possibly caused by device compression against the rim of the bone cavity.The angle of the indentation may be the result of non-perpendicular implantation in the metatarsal head.There appeared to be no guide pin holes in the device, suggesting implant removal by other means.The articulating surface had crevices that were smooth, segmented, and reflective.This wear pattern is not consistent with the scuffing seen in testing to simulate the equivalent of 5 years use.The device was left to rehydrate in 0.9% sterile saline for 24 hours.After rehydration, the device swelled slightly and exhibited a translucent, whitish hue.The scuff marks and wear patterns remained consistent after rehydration.After rehydration, both the height (9.5 mm) and the diameter (10.2 mm) of the device fell within the specifications of a sterile, manufactured 10mm cartiva device (9.0 mm 10.3 mm for height and 10.2 mm 11.0 mm for diameter.The mass of the device 0.8 was slightly lower than the mass data recorded from sterile, manufactured devices (0.85 - 0.93g), indicating measurable mass loss in the device, attributable to the areas of material loss characterized above.Based on the available visual and dimensional observations of the returned device, no definitive root cause could be identified regarding the reported event.On november 10st 2020 stryker trauma and extremities acquired cartiva, wright medical, tornier inc.And tornier (b)(4).An effort was made to align the acquired entity complaint files with stryker's policies and procedures.Stryker has performed retrospective review of complaints and the reportability decision was revised to report this incident under the mdr/vigilance process.
|