• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. RSP; RSP BASEPLATE, 30MM, W/P2 COATING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. RSP; RSP BASEPLATE, 30MM, W/P2 COATING Back to Search Results
Model Number 508-32-204
Device Problems Break (1069); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 02/15/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document as soon as it becomes available.
 
Event Description
Revision surgery - the baseplate center screw broken, base plate was completely migrated to the anterior side of the glenoid.Patient had terrible bone quality, surgeon thinks it failed due to bone quality and stress on the implant.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer narrative: the reason for this revision surgery was reported as broken baseplate screw.Baseplate was completely migrated to the anterior side of the glenoid and patient had insufficient bone quality.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 5 years and 2 months apart.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were disposed of at hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements and showed no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the main contributor component listed in the complaint.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to broken baseplate screw.Baseplate was completely migrated to the anterior side of the glenoid and patient had insufficient bone quality.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reason for this revision surgery was reported as broken screw.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 5 years and 2 months apart.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were disposed of at hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements and showed no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the main contributor component listed in the complaint.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to broken screw.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.No other information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RSP
Type of Device
RSP BASEPLATE, 30MM, W/P2 COATING
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd
austin, tx 78758-5445
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd
austin, tx 78758-5445
Manufacturer Contact
kiersten soderman
9800 metric blvd
austin, tx 78758-5445 
MDR Report Key13635894
MDR Text Key286351690
Report Number1644408-2022-00275
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PHX
UDI-Device Identifier00888912144391
UDI-Public(01)00888912144391
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112069
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/29/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/17/2022
Device Model Number508-32-204
Device Catalogue Number508-32-204
Device Lot Number769P1187
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/15/2022
Initial Date FDA Received03/01/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/02/2022
03/28/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/18/2022
03/29/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/19/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
506-03-114 LOT 831C1351; 506-03-118 LOT 832C1242; 506-03-118 LOT 832C1273; 506-03-126 LOT 834C1299; 508-32-101 LOT 862C2243; 509-00-432 LOT 385P1062
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-