|
Model Number 8360-10 |
Device Problems
Material Fragmentation (1261); Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/25/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to aesculap inc.That a prestige atra grasper dbl-act 5mm (part # 8360-10) was used during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2022.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the distal tip detached into the surgical field.The complaint device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of this event.Although requested, additional information has not been made available.The malfunction is filed under (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Should relevant additional information / investigation results become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information - b5, d9, e1 (reporter name, email, phone), e3 corrected information - b3, b5.Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Should relevant additional information / investigation results become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to aesculap inc.That a prestige atra grasper dbl-act 5mm (part # 8360-10) was used during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2022.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the distal tip detached into the surgical field.The complaint device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of this event.Although requested, additional information has not been made available.The malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer evaluation: the device was returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.A visual examination of the device was performed which revealed that both links associated with jaw were missing, the actuation on the grasper felt slightly resistive, the plastic cap for bottom housing screw was missing, and excessive glue was identified holding in the flush port.Additionally, the proximal end of the jaw housing appears to have broken off or was potentially modified.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was not able to be conducted by the manufacturer as the lot # was not made available.However, all device history records (dhr) are reviewed and released according to documented procedures and a device is not released if it does not meet requirements or is nonconforming.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was able to confirm the failure mode of distal tip breakage.In addition to a supplier corrective action request (scar) being initiated, a corrective action/preventive action (capa) was opened by aesculap inc.For further evaluation of the design transfer of this device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|