The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints from the lot.Based on the information reviewed, the reported for difficult or delayed positioning appears to be related to procedural conditions.The reported poor imaging resolution appears to be due to anatomy.The reported patient effects of perforation of vessels and pericardial effusion, as listed in the mitraclip instruction for use (ifu), are known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported perforation of vessels and pericardial effusion appeared to be due to procedural conditions.The reported hospitalization, unexpected medical intervention, and surgical intervention were a result of case specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|