As reported, during a percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a ultraxx nephrostomy balloon could not be inflated due to leakage.An amplatz dilator was used to complete the procedure with good outcome for the patient.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Summary of event: as reported, during a percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a ultraxx nephrostomy balloon could not be inflated due to leakage.The balloon was inflated to 16 atmospheres.An amplatz dilator was used to complete the procedure with good outcome for the patient.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), quality control procedures, and a personnel interview were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection and functional test of the complaint device was also conducted.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.The balloon material had a jagged, u-shaped tear.Tool marks were noted near the tear and the leakage was confirmed.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other related complaints associated with the complaint device lot.Because there were no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was functionally inspected by quality control and no notable gaps in production or processing controls were noted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The instructions for use (ifu) provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: inflation device preparation and balloon inflation "make all aspiration and injection maneuvers with the lock lever pushed left, i.E., unlocked.In this position, you can freely pull the piston back for aspiration, or push it forward for injection.To lock the piston in position, slide the lever right to the straight up position.¿ "to inflate the balloon, engage the lock lever, turn the palm grip on the piston clockwise slowly until the desired inflation pressure is reached.Close the stopcock, (lock lever) on the inflation device to maintain pressure.¿ the presence of tool marks suggests that the tear in the balloon¿s material was inadvertently caused by the customer while manipulating the balloon.Therefore, cook has concluded that unintended user error caused or contributed to this event.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|