• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SPACELABS HEALTHCARE INC. SPACELABS ULTRAVIEW SL COMMAND MODULE; ULTRAVIEW SL MULTIPARAMETER MODULE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SPACELABS HEALTHCARE INC. SPACELABS ULTRAVIEW SL COMMAND MODULE; ULTRAVIEW SL MULTIPARAMETER MODULE Back to Search Results
Model Number 91496
Device Problems Device Alarm System (1012); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); High Readings (2459)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/06/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Spacelabs has initiated an investigation into this matter.A supplemental report will be filed once the investigation is complete.
 
Event Description
The customer, a nurse, reported that during a patient procedure, their command module did not generate an alarm for an episode of tachycardia.It was also alleged that the command module did not provide an accurate spo2 reading.There was no harm to the patient or user was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Our review of the patent's ics database record confirmed the report of inaccurate heart rate readings during the event, which triggered several false alarms.It was also confirmed that there was no bradycardia or tachycardia present during the event at 3:17am a spacelabs field service engineer (fse) was dispatched to further evaluate the reported problem.The fse discussed the event with the hospital staff who clarified that their complaint is that the spacelabs monitoring equipment displayed inaccurrate heart rate readings on february 6, 2022.At 3:17am on february 6, 2022, the nurse saw an episode of bradycardia with a heart rate of 27 beats per minute (bpm).The nursing staff intervened and discovered that the patient's hr was actually above 100 bpm.The hospital staff clarified that there is no allegation of a failure to alarm associated with this event and there was no patient injury associated with the reported event.The fse tested the monitoring equipment used during the reported event and observed that inaccurate heart rate readings were being generated during testing.The fse and biomedical engineer also observed that the ecg lead wires in use contained visible wear on the leads and cracks in the insulation, the damaged lead wires were replaced and the reported issue involving inaccurrate heart rate readings was no longer present.The damaged lead wires were discarded after being replaced.The clinical parameters operations manual (b)(4) advises that all patient cables or sensors should be visually inspected at the time of use and warns that cables or sensors that exhibit obvious damage should not be used.The report is complete, and the issue is considered closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPACELABS ULTRAVIEW SL COMMAND MODULE
Type of Device
ULTRAVIEW SL MULTIPARAMETER MODULE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SPACELABS HEALTHCARE INC.
35301 se center st.
snoqualmie WA 98065
Manufacturer Contact
matthew esparza
35301 se center st.
snoqualmie, WA 98065
4253635512
MDR Report Key13743442
MDR Text Key290310281
Report Number3010157426-2022-00007
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K103142
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,02/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number91496
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/08/2022
Initial Date FDA Received03/12/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/08/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/25/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age34 WK
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight1 KG
-
-