• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC COOK COPE-LOOP CATHETER; LJE CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC COOK COPE-LOOP CATHETER; LJE CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 085110
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Fistula (1862); Pleural Effusion (2010)
Event Date 04/05/2012
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Literature article/journal; apr2012: gnessin, e., mandeville, j.A., handa, s.E., et.Al., 2012, the utility of noncontrast computed tomography in the prompt diagnosis of postoperative complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Pma/510(k) number = k191498.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a total of 29 patients underwent a pnl procedure that resulted in thoracic complications.A total of two patients developed a hydro-pneumothorax but did not require treatment.A total of 25 patients developed a pleural effusion; 9 patients required thoracentesis, 1 patient required a thoracostomy.Two patients developed a calyceal-pleural fistula; one patient required stent placement.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unchanged, unknown or unavailable.Additional information: b3 event description: it was reported that a total of 29 patients underwent a pnl procedure that resulted in thoracic complications.A total of two patients developed a hydro-pneumothorax but did not require treatment.A total of 25 patients developed a pleural effusion; 9 patients required thoracentesis, 1 patient required a thoracostomy.Two patients developed a calyceal-pleural fistula; one patient required stent placement.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.Investigation - evaluation reviews of instructions for use (ifu) and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed; however, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.The current quality control procedures were inspected instead of the controls at the time of the journal article for the sake of relevance.It was concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify device functionality prior to distribution.A review of the device history record could not be completed due to lack of lot information from the user facility.A review of complaint history records could not be completed due to lack of lot information from the user facility.The instructions for use (ifu) that is currently packaged with the device was reviewed for relevant information pertaining to the reported failure mode.Catheter placement: ¿introduce the 21-gauge needle below the twelfth rib, about five finger-breadths from the midline.Advance the needle in short steps toward the lower pole until the needle is seen moving with respiration.While the patient holds his or her breath, advance the needle no further than 3cm.If urine is not aspirated, repeat the process using a slightly different angle until a calyx is successfully punctured.¿ there is a limited availability of information given the date the study was published.Potential causes for the failure mode are patient factors, inadvertent user issues, and procedural issues.The current instructions for use that is packaged with the device was inspected and determined to contain adequate instructions for the application of the device and how to prevent misplacement/malposition of the device and the potential harms that could result from such an occurrence.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COOK COPE-LOOP CATHETER
Type of Device
LJE CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key13800576
MDR Text Key291845978
Report Number1820334-2022-00410
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/16/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number085110
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/21/2022
Initial Date FDA Received03/17/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/18/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/16/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-