• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LUTONIX, INC LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED PTA DILATATION CATHETER; DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LUTONIX, INC LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED PTA DILATATION CATHETER; DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 9004
Device Problems Obstruction of Flow (2423); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/21/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure in the right lower limb, the device allegedly had an obstruction issue.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.(expiration date: 07/2023).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: (expiry date: 07/2023).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure in the right lower limb, the device allegedly had an obstruction issue.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.One radiographic video was reviewed.The first video is an angiogram starting at the right femoral artery bifurcation.As the angiogram moves down the thigh it appears that there are multiple areas of focal dissections along the superficial femoral artery.The second video appears to show relatively normal peroneal artery runoff to the ankle.The peroneal artery seems to be the only major arterial flow to the foot besides collaterals.It appears the superficial femoral artery has multiple areas of dissections.Although video or images of the angioplasty procedure are not provided, these findings along the superficial femoral artery could represent post-angioplasty dissections.This is a known consequence and potential complication after performing angioplasty.If the dissection appears flow-limiting, placement of a stent can usually restore normal arterial flow patterns.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.The definitive root cause for the reported failure could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: (expiry date: 07/2023).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure in the right lower limb, the device allegedly had an obstruction issue.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED PTA DILATATION CATHETER
Type of Device
DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
LUTONIX, INC
9409 science center dr
new hope MN 55428
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury 12804
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key13838638
MDR Text Key288908331
Report Number3006513822-2022-00009
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ONU
UDI-Device Identifier00801741166952
UDI-Public(01)00801741166952
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
PMA/PMN Number
P130024
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9004
Device Catalogue Number9090413600150
Device Lot NumberGFEU0278
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/22/2022
Initial Date FDA Received03/21/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/20/2022
05/27/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/22/2022
05/31/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/18/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age82 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-