• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 11500AJ
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Material Perforation (2205); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 02/18/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to edwards for evaluation as is pending evaluation.A supplemental mdr will be submitted once the product evaluation is complete or additional information is received.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Edwards received information that a 21mm 11500aj aortic pericardial valve, implanted approximately six (6) months, was explanted due to aortic regurgitation.The device was originally implanted for minimally invasive cardiac surgery aortic valve replacement to correct aortic stenosis.The device was explanted and replaced with an sjm mechanical valve with no patient adverse events reported.The patient status was reported as recovered.The device was returned for evaluation.There was no allegation of device malfunction.Patient age at implant: (b)(6).The doctor commented that the leaflet was perforated by a cor-knot, resulting in the aortic regurgitation, and this event was not device related.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10.Additional manufacturer narrative: the complaint is confirmed.An edwards/supplier manufacturing defect is not confirmed.If the surgeon does not cut sutures close to the knot, excess suture tails may result in abrasion, perforation, or damage to the leaflet.This may require an exchange of the device.Based on the information available, the cor-knot came into contact with the leaflet causing a suture tail abrasion.The most likely cause is procedural factors.Pannus overgrowth, or host tissue, is considered to be a form of non-structural valve dysfunction.The growth of host tissue on the sewing ring is expected and is a natural part of the healing reaction to prosthesis implantation.Pannus can have both beneficial and harmful effects depending on the amount of growth.A small amount of host tissue growth over the suture line is needed to form a non-thrombogenic surface and complete the healing process after valve implantation.In contrast, if there is an excessive amount of pannus growth, it can extend onto the cusp surfaces leading to thickening of the cusps, leaflet immobility, elevated gradients, and stenosis.Host tissue growth can also contribute to cusp retraction or curling resulting in valvular regurgitation.Host fibrous (pannus) tissue growth is not a malfunction of the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A perforation, approximately 2mm x 2mm wide, was observed on leaflet 3.The perforation was beveled at the outflow aspect, a typical characteristic of those caused by suture tail/fastener abrasion.No sutures remained attached to the sewing ring around leaflet 3.Serrated mechanical damage marks were also observed on the outflow surface of leaflet 3.Moderate host tissue overgrowth encroached onto the tissue and into the orifice at the greatest distance of approximately 8 mm on leaflet 3 at the inflow aspect.Host tissue overgrowth on the stent circumference was moderate at the outflow aspect and minimal at the inflow aspect.The x-ray demonstrated the wireform around leaflet 3 was bent outward and the v fit cocr alloy band was not expanded.Wireform was exposed on commissure 3 and around leaflets 1 and 3 on the inflow aspect.Customer report of regurgitation was confirmed through observed leaflet perforation.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
reginald santos
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492502731
MDR Report Key13860581
MDR Text Key287681509
Report Number2015691-2022-04560
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150048
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/06/2023
Device Model Number11500AJ
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/03/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/25/2022
Initial Date FDA Received03/23/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/11/2022
05/25/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/07/2022
05/27/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/06/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Life Threatening; Hospitalization;
Patient Age37 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-