MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SÃ RL CH 5.5 EXP VERSE FEN SCR 6.0X40; ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 199723640 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problems
Cyst(s) (1800); Non-union Bone Fracture (2369)
|
Event Date 02/23/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Additional narrative: additional product code: pml.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that a patient had a broken screw in her right l5 pedicle.Patient status/ outcome / consequences? yes, patient consequence description/was there a clinical outcome experienced by the patient (infection, inflammation, etc.)? patient developed a facet cyst, potentially due to the non-union and broken screw., was other medical intervention (e.G.X-rays, additional procedures, prescriptions, otc, revision) required: yes, if yes, describe.Revision and removal of implants.This complaint involves one (1) device 5.5 exp verse fen scr 6.0x40.This is report 1 of 1 for complaint (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: h6: a device history record (mre) review, was not possible because the required lot code was not provided.The photo was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the device from the photo.Visual analysis of the photo identified there is evidence of breakage between the tulip and shaft of the 5.5 exp verse fen scr 6.0x40.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed for 5.5 exp verse fen scr 6.0x40.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|