• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCES BD FACS¿ LYSE WASH ASSISTANT; STATION, PIPETTING DILUTING CLINICAL USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCES BD FACS¿ LYSE WASH ASSISTANT; STATION, PIPETTING DILUTING CLINICAL USE Back to Search Results
Model Number 337146
Device Problem Contamination of Device Ingredient or Reagent (2901)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/25/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medical device expiration date: na.A device evaluation is anticipated but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the bd facs¿ lyse wash assistant caused carryover between tubes during sample preparation.There was no report of adverse patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "customer reports that there is quite some carry-over from one tube to another during sample preparation.The issue did not affect significantly the results so far.Customer is still investigating the effect of the issue on patient's results." were samples contaminated? --yes.Are there erroneous results on patient samples for diagnostic test? --yes.Was there any delay of treatment due to the issue? --no.If patient samples were redrawn, was there any change or delay of treatment? --no.Was there any physical harm/injury to the patient due to the issue? --no.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the bd facs¿ lyse wash assistant caused carryover between tubes during sample preparation.There was no report of adverse patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "customer reports that there is quite some carry-over from one tube to another during sample preparation.The issue did not affect significantly the results so far.Customer is still investigating the effect of the issue on patient's results." 1.Were samples contaminated? --yes.1.Are there erroneous results on patient samples for diagnostic test? --yes.2.Was there any delay of treatment due to the issue? --no.3.If patient samples were redrawn, was there any change or delay of treatment? --no.4.Was there any physical harm/injury to the patient due to the issue? --no.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6: investigation summary: ¿ scope of issue: the scope of issue is only limited to bd facs lyse wash assistant, part # 337146 and serial # (b)(6).¿ problem statement: customer reported the issue of carryover between sample tests.¿ manufacturing defect trend: there are zero qns (quality notifications) related to the reported issue.Date range from 08mar2021 to 08mar2022.¿ complaint trend: there are 9 complaints related to the issue of carryover between sample tests; pr# (b)(4).Date range from 08mar2021 to 08mar2022.¿ manufacturing device history record (dhr) review: dhr part #337146 serial # (b)(6), file # 337146-337146-k33714600572-100575954-15, was reviewed.The instrument met all the manufacturing specifications prior to release.¿ investigation result / analysis: the investigation was performed and based on the review of the complaint trend, defect trend, dhr, risk analysis and servicemax, the root cause of the carryover was due to incorrectly configured cell wash block tubing.The customer had initially reported that they observed carryover during sample preparation.The fse (field service engineer) discussed the issue with the customer and the customer noted that the issue occurred before a recent preventative maintenance with ~1300 events and after the preventative maintenance at ~50 events.The fse ran the cell wash test with the top cover removed and found that the spindle stream was abnormal.Upon further visual inspection, the cell wash block assembly¿s tubing was incorrectly configured.After correctly configuring the tubing, the top cover was refitted and the cell wash test was run again and passed.The customer then ran 3 samples to confirm that the carryover had been resolved and the instrument was determined to be functioning as expected.Although the unexpected results were from patient samples, no patient was treated nor harmed from incorrect results.The results were captured prior to any diagnosis decision and was reported to bd as not expected.Proper daily and monthly cleaning procedures can be found under ¿maintenance¿ in the user guide; bd facs¿ lyse wash assistant system instructions for use, #23-11113-01 rev.1/vers.A.The safety risk of this hazard has been identified to be within the acceptable level.¿ service max review: review of related work order #: 02365810, case # (b)(4).Install date: 15apr2015.Defective part number: n/a.Work order notes: o subject / reported: 337146 - bd facs lyse wash assistant - carry-over issue.O problem description: customer reports that there is quite some carry-over from one tube to another during sample preparation.The issue did not affect significantly the results so far.Customer is still investigating the effect of the issue on patient's results.O work performed: dj 10mar2022 - discussed fault with customer - issue occurred right before recent preventative maintenance intervention - carry over at end of day towards end of run ~1300 events.After preventative maintenance significantly improved but still ~50 events.Ran cell wash test with top cover off - stream from spindle abnormal - visual inspection showed wash block assembly tubing incorrectly configured - wash solution input into vent block and vent line input into wash block.Correctly configured tubing of cell wash block - ran cell wash test again - wash stream from spindle now normal.Refitted cover and ran cell wash test again - all okay.Customer prepared 3 samples - each sample tube followed by empty tubes for pbs collection during wash step to check for carry over - ran samples on canto - no carry over seen - issue resolved.Completed service report and emailed to customer.Repair intervention completed successfully.O cause: dj 10mar2022 - incorrectly configured tubing into wash block assembly.O solution: dj 10mar2022 - correctly configured wash block tubing.¿ returned sample evaluation: a return sample was not requested because there were no parts replaced.¿ risk analysis: risk management file part # 337146ra, rev.01/vers.B, bd facs¿ lyse/wash assistant risk analysis was reviewed.No new hazards have been identified and the current mitigation is sufficient.Hazard(s) identified? yes or no? o id: 2.1.1.O hazard: carryover.O cause: clogged orifice.O harmful effects: incorrect results, damaged instrument.O risk control: replace orifice at each pm interval.O implementation verification: reliability testing in sv lab; protocol: gppd0010-03 rev a.O effectiveness verification: system characterization summary report lwa carryover evaluation phase iii version 1.0 10/mar/2010.O probability: 1.O severity: 3.O risk index: 3.O residual risk evaluation: a.O new hazards: none.O id: 3.1.4.O hazard: 1.Unprepped sample.2.No answer.3.Loss of sample.O cause: 1.Non recommended tube.2.Sensor window dirty.O harmful effects: 1.Delayed or no results.2.Increased cost of test due to the need to reprep and rerun.3.Blood exposure is higher risk without fixative.O risk control: 1.Screen displays tube 2.Customer inspects processed rack 3.Users guide specifications for proper tube.O implementation verification: ec01147e504878.O effectiveness verification: lwa-09-02p and -02f stress and hazards testing.O probability: 1.O severity: 3.O risk index: 3.O residual risk evaluation: a.O new hazards: none.Mitigation(s) sufficient: yes or no? ¿ root cause: based on the investigation results the root cause of the carryover was due to an incorrectly configured cell wash block tubing.¿ conclusion: based on the investigation results the root cause of the carryover was due to an incorrectly configured cell wash block tubing.The fse started by performing a preventative maintenance on the instrument but the issue persisted.The stream from the spindle was found to be abnormal and a visual inspection of the cell wash block assembly confirmed an incorrect configuration of the tubing.After refitting the tubing and cover, the instrument was tested and confirmed to be functioning as expected.No one was harmed or injured, and no medical diagnosis was performed due to the erroneous results.The safety risk of this hazard has been identified to be within the acceptable level.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD FACS¿ LYSE WASH ASSISTANT
Type of Device
STATION, PIPETTING DILUTING CLINICAL USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCES
2350 qume drive
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCES
2350 qume drive
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key13950729
MDR Text Key289507767
Report Number2916837-2022-00075
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JQW
UDI-Device Identifier00382903371464
UDI-Public00382903371464
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/28/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model Number337146
Device Catalogue Number337146
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/10/2022
Initial Date FDA Received03/30/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/28/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/22/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-