• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PERFUSION SYSTEMS AORTIC ROOT ANTEGRADE ANTEGRADE CANNULA WITH FLOWGUARD; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PERFUSION SYSTEMS AORTIC ROOT ANTEGRADE ANTEGRADE CANNULA WITH FLOWGUARD; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Model Number 21012
Device Problem Suction Problem (2170)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 02/01/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during use of this aortic root antegrade cannula with flow guard during an aortic valve replacement procedure, upon administering cardioplegia, when trying to vent the patients heart/empty the heart using the suction lines of the custom tubing pack, the green suction line sucked flat and the customer could not remove blood from the cannula.The clinicians then swapped the green suction line for the blue suction line (attached the blue suction line to the aortic root cannula) and this line also sucked flat and they could not remove blood from the aortic root cannula or patient's heart.The inability to vent the heart was managed by taking the vent off (detached from the ¿y¿ spike) and then the customer could see blood was pouring out and they suctioned the excess with a hand sucker.The custom tubing pack was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects as a result of this issue.Additional information was received from the customer stating they did not replace the suckers that were attached to the pump and handed up to the table and they did not cut the valves out for replacement.The flow rate was not recorded, but it would have not exceeded 1.5l/minute at its maximum.The customer stated that it would only go up this high if there was an issue with the valve to see if it was sucking.The customer stated that they can say that it was between 0.1 l/min and 0.6 l/minute for their standard practice and with this case also.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: visual inspection showed no outward signs of any damage.During the cleaning process there was flow observed from the cannula and vent line.The reason for return was not confirmed.Conclusion: the complaint is unconfirmed for a suction issue during use.There was no observed damage to the device and performance testing indicated that the device functions as intended.It is unknown what may have caused this occurrence.The device history record was not reviewed as the returned product analysis found no evidence of manufacturing issues with the returned device and the lot number is unknown.Trends for issues with this device are monitored.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AORTIC ROOT ANTEGRADE ANTEGRADE CANNULA WITH FLOWGUARD
Type of Device
CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
PERFUSION SYSTEMS
7611 northland dr
brooklyn park MN 55428
Manufacturer (Section G)
PERFUSION SYSTEMS
7611 northland dr
brooklyn park MN 55428
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key13952197
MDR Text Key288502328
Report Number2184009-2022-00055
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K810548
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/03/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number21012
Device Catalogue Number21012
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/18/2022
Initial Date FDA Received03/30/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/05/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-