• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY DISPOSABLE MARKED SPRING TIP GUIDEWIRE; ENDOSCOPIC GUIDEWIRE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY DISPOSABLE MARKED SPRING TIP GUIDEWIRE; ENDOSCOPIC GUIDEWIRE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY Back to Search Results
Model Number DIS150
Device Problem Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
Patient Problems Perforation of Esophagus (2399); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 01/25/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This complaint was created due to the receipt of a medwatch report (mw5107202) on 8mar22.The current complaint database has been researched for this event and there were no findings.The report was found to be written against dis150, disposable marked spring tip guidewire, that was being used during a egd with esophageal dilation and botox injection that occurred on (b)(6) 2022.The report stated ¿patient having esophageal dilation for diffuse esophageal spasms.During dilations the guidewire for dilation became embedded in esophagus, a tear occurred in the distal esophagus which was repaired with an ovesco clip.The guidewires may appear easier to kink with manipulation.Also.A perforation of the upper esophageal sphincter occurred which required a left cervical neck exploration/drainage and peg tub placement.¿.Further assessment questioning found that after the last dilation, the guidewire and the dilator were attempted to be withdrawn but met resistance when attempting to pull out the guidewire.So, the guidewire was kept in place.Relook with the scope revealed that the distal tip of the guidewire was kinked/coiled with the loop embedded in the esophageal mucosa.Multiple attempts to detach the guidewire loop from the esophageal mucosa were made and ultimately detachment was successful using rat tooth forceps and pulling the entire guidewire into the stomach.3 cm vertical tear visualized where the guidewire had previously embedded.The guidewire after removal did appear to have a kink, this time in middle aspect, likely creating resistance in the ues and oral cavity.Initially the perforation was clipped and then the patient had cervical exploration, egd and feeding tube placement.The patient was intubated and placed in icu.The patient had 9 days admission total.Current status of patient is listed as ¿stable¿.This report is being raised on the basis of injury due to a report of tear in the distal esophagus causing intubation and icu admittance.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device is not expected to be returned for evaluation and review.However, the complaint investigation is not complete at this time.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the complaint investigation.This issue will continue to be monitored through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device is not being returned and no photograph evidence was provided.Therefore, the reported failure could not be verified.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.This is the only complaint for this lot number and failure mode within the past two years.A two-year review of complaint history revealed there has been a total of (b)(4) complaints, regarding (b)(4) devices, for this device family and failure mode.During this same time frame (b)(4) devices have been manufactured and shipped worldwide.Should all the complaint devices have been found confirmed for this reported failure, the rate of failure would be (b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised that the guidewire should not be advanced if resistance is met without determining the cause and taking remedial action.This issue will continue to be monitored through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
 
Event Description
This complaint was created due to the receipt of a medwatch report (mw5107202) on (b)(6) 2022.The current complaint database has been researched for this event and there were no findings.The report was found to be written against dis150, disposable marked spring tip guidewire, that was being used during a egd with esophageal dilation and botox injection that occurred on (b)(6) 2022.The report stated ¿patient having esophageal dilation for diffuse esophageal spasms.During dilations the guidewire for dilation became embedded in esophagus, a tear occurred in the distal esophagus which was repaired with an ovesco clip.The guidewires may appear easier to kink with manipulation.Also.A perforation of the upper esophageal sphincter occurred which required a left cervical neck exploration/drainage and peg tub placement.¿.Further assessment questioning found that after the last dilation, the guidewire and the dilator were attempted to be withdrawn but met resistance when attempting to pull out the guidewire.So, the guidewire was kept in place.Relook with the scope revealed that the distal tip of the guidewire was kinked/coiled with the loop embedded in the esophageal mucosa.Multiple attempts to detach the guidewire loop from the esophageal mucosa were made and ultimately detachment was successful using rat tooth forceps and pulling the entire guidewire into the stomach.3 cm vertical tear visualized where the guidewire had previously embedded.The guidewire after removal did appear to have a kink, this time in middle aspect, likely creating resistance in the ues and oral cavity.Initially the perforation was clipped and then the patient had cervical exploration, egd and feeding tube placement.The patient was intubated and placed in icu.The patient had 9 days admission total.Current status of patient is listed as ¿stable¿.This report is being raised on the basis of injury due to a report of tear in the distal esophagus causing intubation and icu admittance.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DISPOSABLE MARKED SPRING TIP GUIDEWIRE
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC GUIDEWIRE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY
Manufacturer (Section D)
CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY
ave. alejandro dumas 11321
complejo industrial chihuahua
chihuahua 31136
MX  31136
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY
ave. alejandro dumas 11321
complejo industrial chihuahua
chihuahua 31136
MX   31136
Manufacturer Contact
john berga
11311 concept blvd
largo, FL 33773
7273995358
MDR Report Key13955717
MDR Text Key290562635
Report Number3007305485-2022-00040
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OCY
UDI-Device Identifier10653405986553
UDI-Public(01)10653405986553(17)231207(10)202112075
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Risk Manager
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/03/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/07/2023
Device Model NumberDIS150
Device Catalogue NumberDIS150
Device Lot Number202112075
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/08/2022
Initial Date FDA Received03/30/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/06/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/07/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
RAT TOOTH FORCEPS.; RAT TOOTH FORCEPS.
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight100 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-