EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES RETROGRADE CARDIOPLEGIA CATHETER; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number RC2012 |
Device Problem
Burst Container or Vessel (1074)
|
Patient Problem
Perforation of Vessels (2135)
|
Event Date 03/08/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the balloon of rc2012 retrograde cardioplegia cannula ruptured during use with a concomitant rupture of the patient's coronary sinus occurred.The cannula was inserted to the coronary sinus and the cardioplegia solution was injected.At first, the coronary sinus pressure was indicated as 20mmhg, however the pressure went down to a single digit level.The cannula was removed, and the balloon rupture was confirmed then.At the same time, the patient coronary sinus was also confirmed to be ruptured.The patient coronary sinus was repaired and another rc2012 retrograde cardioplegia cannula was used.The surgery was completed, and the patient status was reported as 'under treatment'.There was no calcification of coronary sinus.The flow rate of cardioplegic solution was 200 ml/min, but the injection pressure did not rise, so the flow rate was risen to 300ml/min.The cannula was inserted when the patient was partially on cardiopulmonary bypass.The location of the tip of the cannula was correct as the surgeon was placing his hand to the patient's heart and checking it by the echo.Balloon inflation test before use was probably not performed.Inconsistencies of the device were probably not noted before use.There was no kink on the cannula.The customer commented that the reason for the coronary sinus rupture whether it was device related or patient/procedural related was unknown.The device was stored flat at the hospital.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections: h2 and h6 (type of investigation).Product evaluation: the customer complaint of balloon rupture was confirmed.Balloon failed inflation test due to a balloon rupture.As received, edges of rupture site appeared to match up.All through lumens were found to be patent without any leakage or occlusion.No other visual damage, contamination, or other abnormalities were found to the device.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Root cause analysis: it was reported that the balloon of rc2012 retrograde cardioplegia cannula ruptured after the first dose of cardioplegia solution with a concomitant rupture of the patient's coronary sinus occurred.The cannula was inserted to the coronary sinus and the cardioplegia solution was injected.At first, the coronary sinus pressure was indicated as 20mmhg, however the pressure went down to a single digit level.The cannula was removed, and the balloon rupture was confirmed then.At the same time, the patient coronary sinus was also confirmed to be ruptured.The patient coronary sinus was repaired and another rc2012 retrograde cardioplegia cannula was used.The surgery was completed, and the patient status was reported as "under treatment".There was no calcification of coronary sinus.The flow rate of cardioplegic solution was 200 ml/min, but the coronary sinus pressure did not rise, so the flow rate was risen to 300ml/min.The cannula was not manipulated before increasing the flow rate.Total volume of injected cardioplegia before the balloon rupture is unknown.The cannula was inserted when the patient was partially on cardiopulmonary bypass.The location of the tip of the cannula was correct as the surgeon was placing his hand to the patient's heart and checking it by the echo.Balloon inflation test before use was probably not performed.Inconsistencies of the device were probably not noted before use.There was no kink on the cannula.The customer commented that the reason for the coronary sinus rupture whether it was device related or patient/procedural related was unknown.The surgeon was well experienced.The device was stored flat at the hospital.Customer complaint of balloon rupture was confirmed.Balloon failed inflation test due to a balloon rupture.As received, edges of rupture site appeared to match up.All through lumens were found to be patent without any leakage or occlusion.No other visual damage, contamination, or other abnormalities were found to the device.Based on the morphology of the balloon rupture and the customer's description of the event, it is likely that the root cause is related to use error.The ifu states that "flows in excess of 120 ml/min may result in balloon overinflation and/or coronary sinus injury," and the customer reported a flow rate of 300ml/min prior to rupture.In addition, evaluation by manufacturer viant did not indicate the root cause of the balloon rupture was manufacturing related.Per viant "the dhr investigation does not indicate any nonconformances or deviation associated with balloon rupturing." an edwards/supplier defect has not been confirmed, and no addition action is required by edwards or viant.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|