It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the device was allegedly could not be advanced in the patient.It was further reported that guidewire was stuck on the balloon and it could not be removed.Reportedly, the balloon was shrunk and broke while the wire was removed from the balloon.The procedure was completed by using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the device was allegedly could not be advanced in the patient.It was further reported that guidewire was stuck on the balloon and it could not be removed.Reportedly, the balloon was shrunk and broke while the wire was removed from the balloon.The procedure was completed by using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause for the alleged failure to advance guidewire, difficult to remove guidewire and break could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 02/2024), g3, h6(method).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|