• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK VANDERGRIFT INC COOK-SWARTZ DOPPLER PROBE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK VANDERGRIFT INC COOK-SWARTZ DOPPLER PROBE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number DP-SDP001
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Necrosis (1971)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Common name: transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic.Product code: itx.Pma/510(k): 171272.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available or upon completion of investigation.
 
Event Description
This complaint identifies a retrospective study regarding the cook-swartz doppler flow probe.The main postoperative complication of free flap is perfusion compromise.Urgent intervention is critical to increase the chances of flap survival.Invasive flap perfusion monitoring with direct blood flow feedback through the doppler flow probe.Between 2012 and 2016, 35 patients under went breast reconstruction or defect coverage after trauma with a deep inferior epigastric perforator, anterolateral thigh, transverse musculocutaneous gracilis, gracilis, or latissimus dorsi flap in our department.All flaps were monitored with a cook¿swartz probe for 10 days postoperatively.This complaint identifies two flap losses and one partial flap necrosis in three patients.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
D2 - common name: transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic d2b ¿ product code: itx g5 ¿ pma/510(k): 171272.Investigation - evaluation a device was not returned for a physical investigation, therefore a physical investigation could not be performed and the customer's complaint could not be confirmed other than by the literature publication.The customer complaint/event that was entered and reported in trackwise: "identifying two total flap losses and one partial flap necrosis." per literature complaint: "results: signal loss was detected in 8 of the 35 cases.On return to the operating room, six were found to be true positives (relevant disruption of flap perfusion) and two were false positives (due to doppler probe displacement).There were also two false negatives, resulting in a slowly progressive partial flap loss.Flap perfusion was restored in three of the six cases (50%) identified by the probe.Following surgical intervention, three of the six cases had persistent problems with perfusion, resulting in two total flap losses and one partial flap necrosis leading to an overall 5.7% total flap loss.Conclusion: postoperative flap perfusion surveillance is a complex matter.Surgical experience is often helpful but not always reliable.The costs, false-positive, and false negative rates associated with invasive perfusion monitoring with cook¿swartz probe make it most appropriate for buried flaps.And ".Two total flap losses and one partial flap necrosis occurred (5.7% total flap loss)." the two total flap losses and one partial flap necrosis that were identified out of the six (6) cases that lost signal were listed as true positives.A true positive scenario is the loss of the doppler signal and disruption of flap perfusion.In these six cases it appears that the cook-swartz doppler flow probe functioned as intended and alerted the appropriate individuals that the perfusion of blood had ceased.Due to the cessation of blood perfusion, intervention was conducted by the physician.Unfortunately, in three of the six interventions perfusion could not be restored and resulted in the loss of two flaps and one partial necrosis.The device history record (dhr) was unable to be reviewed due to the lot was unknown.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
This complaint identifies a retrospective study regarding the cook-swartz doppler flow probe.The main postoperative complication of free flap is perfusion compromise.Urgent intervention is critical to increase the chances of flap survival.Invasive flap perfusion monitoring with direct blood flow feedback through the doppler flow probe.Between 2012 and 2016, 35 patients under went breast reconstruction or defect coverage after trauma with a deep inferior epigastric perforator, anterolateral thigh, transverse musculocutaneous gracilis, gracilis, or latissimus dorsi flap in our department.All flaps were monitored with a cook¿swartz probe for 10 days postoperatively.This complaint identifies two flap losses and one partial flap necrosis in three patients.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COOK-SWARTZ DOPPLER PROBE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK VANDERGRIFT INC
1186 montgomery lane
vandergrift PA 15690
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK VANDERGRIFT INC
1186 montgomery lane
vandergrift PA 15690
Manufacturer Contact
brian johnston
1186 montgomery lane
vandergrift, PA 15690
7248458621
MDR Report Key13998731
MDR Text Key290312959
Report Number2522007-2022-00012
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ITX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/11/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberDP-SDP001
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/09/2022
Initial Date FDA Received04/04/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/09/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/11/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-