As reported, prior to a percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a ultraxx nephrostomy balloon leaked water from the balloon body upon inflation to 15 atmospheres.A new same type device was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patients body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to the occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Additional information: d4, d9, h4.Corrected information: information was available but inadvertently omitted from the previous medwatch report.E1: (b)(6).E3: purchasing.H3: device has been returned and preliminary evaluation has been performed, however, our investigation is ongoing and device evaluation summary will be included in our follow up report once our investigation has been completed.The event is currently under investigation.A follow-up report will be submitted upon receipt of additional information or completion of the investigation.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
Event summary: as reported, prior to a percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a ultraxx nephrostomy balloon leaked water from the balloon body upon inflation to 15 atmospheres.A new same-type device was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to the occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects.Investigation - evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use, and quality control procedures and a visual inspection and functional test of the device were conducted during the investigation.The device was returned in open original packaging and was functionally tested with a 3ml syringe.The function test resulted in the balloon inflating, although a small leak was noticed at the beginning region of the balloon.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was functionally inspected by quality control and no notable gaps in production or processing controls were noted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The device is provided with instructions for use which state the following regarding device preparation and inflation: ¿note: make all aspiration and injection maneuvers with the lock lever pushed left, i.E., unlocked.In this position, you can freely pull the piston back for aspiration, or push it forward for injection.To lock the piston in position, slide the lever right to the straight up position.10.To inflate the balloon, engage the lock lever, turn the palm grip on the piston clockwise slowly until the desired inflation pressure is reached.Close the stopcock, (lock lever) on the inflation device to maintain pressure.¿ based on the available information, cook has concluded that a cause for this event could not be determined.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and has notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|