Literature article entitled ¿total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy in patients with high hip dislocation secondary to childhood septic arthritis: a matched comparative study with crowe iv developmental dysplasia.¿ written by park cw, lim sj, cha yt, park ys.J arthroplasty.Published 22 aug 2019.2020.Pmid: 31521447.The article's purpose was to ¿compare the clinical and radiographic results of cementless tha with sso in high hip dislocation that resulted from childhood septic arthritis and crowe iv ddh with a mean follow-up period of 12 years.¿ patient data specific: patient 1: (b)(6) man with history of a right septic natural hip.Patient 2: (b)(6) woman with history of highly dislocated hip, childhood infection of the natural hip.Patient data non-specific: 12 men and 46 women with a mean age of 41.3 years.The mean body mass index was 22.9 kg/m2, and the mean duration of follow-up was 12.3 years.It is noted that implants in the study were a combination of depuy and competitor products.Depuy products: pinnacle and duraloc cups, cementless s-rom stems.It is reasonable to conclude depuy heads and liners would be used in conjunction with the cups and stems.Adverse events specific patients: patient 1: persistent thigh pain with delayed union of osteotomy ¿ treated with orif.Patient 2: pain, subsidence and loosening of the stem ¿ revision.Adverse events non-specified patients: intra-op blood loss requiring - transfusion of packed red blood cells.Stem subsidence greater than 3 mm ¿ no intervention noted.Sciatic and femoral nerve palsy ¿ no intervention noted, recovered spontaneously within 1 year without residual symptoms.Pain and delayed radiographic union of osteotomy ¿ additional surgical fixation of osteotomy.Aseptic stem loosening ¿ femoral revision.Dislocation ¿ revision.Ceramic head fracture ¿ revision.Aseptic cup loosening ¿ revision.Dissociation ¿ revision.Literature is a valuable source of information.However, it has limitations, including nonspecific and indeterminate information about each adverse event.The authors do not provide information to identify the devices used during primary procedure for each patient.The adverse events captured in this complaint are the events that could be associated with the noted depuy synthes devices.The events that are associated with competitor devices are excluded from this complaint.The actual number and specific product line of depuy synthes devices associated with the above adverse events is unknown.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : no device associated with this report was received for examination.All available x-rays were reviewed, and there is no progressive evidence that confirms a implant dislocation nor the implant disassociation allegation.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed, and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : a manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed as no finish goods lot number or product code was provided for this device.
|