|
Model Number 214140 |
Device Problem
Unintended Movement (3026)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 03/24/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by sales rep that during a shoulder arthroscopy with rotator cuff repair surgery on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that the jaw was very loose on the expressew iii w/o hook device that it would not grasp the tissue.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information, which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained, that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.The actual device has been returned.And is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary : the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection and functional test of device received.Visual observations revealed wear marks in the entire device.To test its functionality, it was tested on a sample rubber strip; as a result, the upper jaw was loose when the jaws are closed; therefore, it showed that the jaws did not close normally contributing to the holding issue.Manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.According with the visual inspection and the functional test result, this complaint can be confirmed.The possible root cause for the issue experienced can be attributed when clamping excessive tissue between the jaws combined with repetitive twisting action exerts excess load on the jaws causing it to eventually damage the jaw.Since this is a reusable device, this failure has possibly occurred after using it in this manner for many procedures.As per ifu, it is important to inspect the device prior to use to ensure proper mechanical function.Visually inspect the instrument and check for damage and wear.Also, jaws and teeth should align properly.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|