It was reported to gore that the patient underwent surgical treatment to create an access for hemodialysis with a gore-tex® stretch vascular graft ¿ standard-walled.It was stated that the vascular graft was implanted on (b)(6) 2021.It was reported that on (b)(6) 2021, after about 4 months, the vascular graft was explanted due to infection with staphylococcus aureus méti-r.A segment of the graft was sent for analysis.
|
Explant investigation: the device was returned to geprovas for investigation.Submitted in formalin was a gore-tex® stretch vascular graft fragment.The scope and results of the investigation were summarized, and a report was submitted to w.L.Gore & associates.An explant scientist at w.L.Gore & associates reviewed the report.Explant scientist observations: the graft fragment was reported to measure 15 mm in length with both ends transected and the fragment longitudinally transected.Extremity a was bluntly cut while extremity b presented in a beveled fashion with monofilament blue suture in a continuous pattern along its edge, consistent with an anastomotic site.The ablumen was covered in thin layer of tan to yellow tissue and the blue alignment marks were faintly visible.An area of dark red/brown and yellow material was present near extremity b.The lumen at extremity a was devoid of tissue.Extremity b lumen was occluded by light tan tissue as confirmed by gore during on-site visit.Material disruptions (e.G., transections) were consistent with those caused by surgical instrumentation (e.G., scalpel, scissors) during a surgical procedure.The reported reason for removal was infection, source was not provided, and there was no accusation of infection being device related from the physician.Based on the explant scientist¿s review of the geprovas report and reason for removal, no additional analysis is requested.
|